Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 5;9(6):607.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060607.

Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review

Affiliations
Review

Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review

Pinelopi Konstantinou et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a complex health problem, with various factors involved including the influence of an individual's network. According to the Social Contagion Theory, attitudes and behaviours of an individual can be contagious to others in their social networks. This scoping review aims to collate evidence on how attitudes and vaccination uptake are spread within social networks. Databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the full text of 24 studies being screened. A narrative synthesis approach was used to collate the evidence and interpret findings. Eleven cross-sectional studies were included. Participants held more positive vaccination attitudes and greater likelihood to get vaccinated or vaccinate their child when they were frequently exposed to positive attitudes and frequently discussing vaccinations with family and friends. We also observed that vaccination uptake was decreased when family and friends were hesitant to take the vaccine. Homophily-the tendency of similar individuals to be connected in a social network-was identified as a significant factor that drives the results, especially with respect to race and ethnicity. This review highlights the key role that social networks play in shaping attitudes and vaccination uptake. Public health authorities should tailor interventions and involve family and friends to result in greater vaccination uptake.

Keywords: immunization; scoping review; social contagion theory; social network analysis; vaccination; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of information detailing the database searches, the number of titles and abstracts screened and excluded, and the full texts retrieved and excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A summary of findings explaining how vaccination attitudes and uptake are transmitted within social networks. Note. ++ Lower influence on vaccination attitudes and uptake of individuals compared to other network members (family, peers and friends) based on the total number of studies reporting this information; +++ Higher influence on attitudes and vaccination uptake of individuals compared to other network members (neighbours, co-workers, politicians, healthcare providers) based on the total number of studies reporting this information.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Christakis N.A., Fowler J.H. Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakis N.A., Fowler J.H. Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat. Med. 2013;32:556–577. doi: 10.1002/sim.5408. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scherer C.W., Cho H. A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Anal. 2003;23:261–267. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00306. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aral S., Nicolaides C. Exercise contagion in a global social network. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14753. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14753. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pachucki M.A., Jacques P.F., Christakis N.A. Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. Am. J. Public Health. 2011;101:2170–2177. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300282. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources