Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 24:13:291-301.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S238063. eCollection 2020.

The Joint Influence of Online Rating and Product Price on Purchase Decision: An EEG Study

Affiliations

The Joint Influence of Online Rating and Product Price on Purchase Decision: An EEG Study

Lijun Sun et al. Psychol Res Behav Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Consumers had to encounter and consider product-oriented and review-oriented cues before making an online purchasing decision. It was important to resolve how these cues influenced consumers' online purchasing decision. We also knew little about how the human brain processed these cues simultaneously, and which cue would occupy a dominant position in neural activity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the neural correlates of online shopping decisions and how online rating and product price jointly influenced such purchase decisions.

Research method: Eighteen undergraduates were recruited to participate in this research. Each participant was exposed to all four experimental conditions combining 2 (product price: high vs. low) × 2 (online rating: positive vs. negative) with a total of 192 trials. They were required to rate the degree of willingness-to-pay. EEG data were obtained with 64 electrodes placed on the Easy Cap according to the International 10-20 system. We conducted both the event-related potentials analysis and the time-frequency analysis for the EEG data.

Results: The behavioral findings indicated that products with positive rating and low price increased the willingness-to-pay. The EEG results showed that larger late positive potentials were elicited by products with low price compared with high price under positive rating condition, but not under negative rating condition, reflecting the modulated effect of online rating on the emotional arousal elicited by product price. Furthermore, we found larger alpha event related desynchronization elicited by products with positive rating compared with negative rating, indicating that more cognitive resources were allocated for products with a positive rating.

Conclusion: Combined with behavioral and EEG analysis, our results emphasized the more important position of product rating compared with price. The findings deepened the understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying the online shopping decision process. More attention should be paid to online ratings on the webpage of the electronic store, because negative ratings made a product less appealing for prospective consumers regardless of price. Thus, the owners should build good reputations for their online products, which were fundamental to the consumers' online purchasing decisions.

Keywords: LPP; alpha-ERD; neural mechanism; online rating; product price.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the experimental trial structure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean ratings of the degree of willingness-to-pay across four conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Grand mean ERP waveforms elicited by four conditions at Pz electrode site. Black-dotted rectangles indicated the time window used for statistical analysis and the arrow indicated the LPP component.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scalp distributions of the low price minus high price difference waves under the positive and negative rating conditions in the 500–1000 ms.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The spectrogram at each time-frequency point at Pz electrode site in four conditions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The spectrogram of the positive and negative rating conditions (average across different price) at Pz electrode site, and the topography of the alpha-ERD from 8 to 13 Hz in the time windows of 500–1000 ms and 1000–1500 ms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kostyra DS, Reiner J, Natter M, Klapper D. Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. Int J Res Mark. 2016;33(1):11–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.12.004 - DOI
    1. Wang QZ, Meng L, Liu ML, Wang Q, Ma QG. How do social-based cues influence consumers’ online purchase decisions? An event-related potential study. Electron Commer Res. 2016;16(1):1–26. doi:10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0 - DOI
    1. Hernández-Ortega B. Don’t believe strangers: online consumer reviews and the role of social psychological distance. Inf Manag. 2017.
    1. Knutson B, Rick S, Wimmer GE, Prelec D, Loewenstein G. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron. 2007;53(1):147–156. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karmarkar UR, Shiv B, Knutson B. Cost conscious? The neural and behavioral impact of price primacy on decision making. J Soc Mark Res. 2015;52(4):467–481. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0488 - DOI

Grants and funding

We received financial supports for this research from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 71502048) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number: 2018B20714).