Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 25;10(2):e033592.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033592.

Use of social media for cancer prevention and early diagnosis: scoping review protocol

Affiliations
Review

Use of social media for cancer prevention and early diagnosis: scoping review protocol

Aradhna Kaushal et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for health promotion messages focusing on cancer prevention and early diagnosis. However, there has been very little synthesis of the evaluation of such campaigns, limiting the ability to apply learning to the design of future social media campaigns. We aimed to provide a broad overview of the current research base on social media interventions for cancer prevention and early diagnosis, to identify knowledge gaps and to inform policy, practice and future research questions.

Methods: We will use scoping review methodology to explore the available evidence on social media interventions for cancer prevention and early diagnosis, with a focus on methodological approaches. Quantitative and qualitative studies and reports will be identified through searching several research databases, through internet searching for grey literature and by screening the citations of studies included in the review. All identified studies will undergo independent title and abstract screening and full-text screening against inclusion and exclusion criteria. We plan to chart the data from included studies to record the characteristics of the social media interventions, resources, activities, outputs, outcomes and impact. Charted data will be collated and summarised using a narrative synthesis. The interpretation and implications of the findings will be enhanced by consultation with relevant stakeholders such as public health organisations, cancer charities, and patient and public involvement groups when preliminary results are available.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The results will be used to identify research questions for future systematic reviews and to inform the development of future social media interventions. We will disseminate findings in peer-reviewed journals and at relevant conferences.

Keywords: health policy; public health; social medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, et al. . Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International cancer benchmarking partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 2011;377:127–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiom SC. Diagnosing cancer earlier: reviewing the evidence for improving cancer survival. Br J Cancer 2015;112:S1–5. 10.1038/bjc.2015.23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK About be clear on cancer, 2014. Available: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/awareness-and-preve...
    1. Power E, Wardle J. Change in public awareness of symptoms and perceived barriers to seeing a doctor following be clear on cancer campaigns in England. Br J Cancer 2015;112(Suppl 1):S22–6. 10.1038/bjc.2015.32 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ironmonger L, Ohuma E, Ormiston-Smith N, et al. . An evaluation of the impact of large-scale interventions to raise public awareness of a lung cancer symptom. Br J Cancer 2015;112:207–16. 10.1038/bjc.2014.596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources