Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model
- PMID: 27657140
- PMCID: PMC5035953
- DOI: 10.3390/ani6090058
Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model
Abstract
The present structured, systematic and comprehensive welfare evaluation of an injured working farm dog using the Five Domains Model is of interest in its own right. It is also an example for others wanting to apply the Model to welfare evaluations in different species and contexts. Six stages of a fictitious scenario involving the dog are considered: (1) its on-farm circumstances before one hind leg is injured; (2) its entanglement in barbed wire, cutting it free and transporting it to a veterinary clinic; (3) the initial veterinary examination and overnight stay; (4) amputation of the limb and immediate post-operative recovery; (5) its first four weeks after rehoming to a lifestyle block; and (6) its subsequent life as an amputee and pet. Not all features of the scenario represent average-to-good practice; indeed, some have been selected to indicate poor practice. It is shown how the Model can draw attention to areas of animal welfare concern and, importantly, to how welfare enhancement may be impeded or facilitated. Also illustrated is how the welfare implications of a sequence of events can be traced and evaluated, and, in relation to specific situations, how the degrees of welfare compromise and enhancement may be graded. In addition, the choice of a companion animal, contrasting its welfare status as a working dog and pet, and considering its treatment in a veterinary clinical setting, help to highlight various welfare impacts of some practices. By focussing attention on welfare problems, the Model can guide the implementation of remedies, including ways of promoting positive welfare states. Finally, wider applications of the Five Domains Model are noted: by enabling both negative and positive welfare-relevant experiences to be graded, the Model can be applied to quality of life assessments and end-of-life decisions and, with particular regard to negative experiences, the Model can also help to strengthen expert witness testimony during prosecutions for serious ill treatment of animals.
Keywords: amputation; animal welfare assessment; leg injury; negative experiences; positive experiences; quality of life; rehoming as amputee; veterinary evaluation; working dog welfare.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5035953/bin/animals-06-00058-g001.gif)
Similar articles
-
Review: The Five Domains model and promoting positive welfare in pigs.Animal. 2022 Jun;16 Suppl 2:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100378. Epub 2021 Oct 23. Animal. 2022. PMID: 34697006 Review.
-
Using the Five Domains Model to develop welfare assessment guidelines for Thoroughbred horses in New Zealand.N Z Vet J. 2020 May;68(3):150-156. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2020.1715900. Epub 2020 Feb 20. N Z Vet J. 2020. PMID: 31973682 Review.
-
Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.Animals (Basel). 2017 Aug 9;7(8):60. doi: 10.3390/ani7080060. Animals (Basel). 2017. PMID: 28792485 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living".Animals (Basel). 2016 Mar 14;6(3):21. doi: 10.3390/ani6030021. Animals (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27102171 Free PMC article.
-
Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include 'quality of life' and related concepts.N Z Vet J. 2011 Nov;59(6):263-71. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.610283. N Z Vet J. 2011. PMID: 22040330 Review.
Cited by
-
Rethinking the utility of the Five Domains model.Anim Welf. 2023 Sep 27;32:e62. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.84. eCollection 2023. Anim Welf. 2023. PMID: 38487458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mental Experiences in Wild Animals: Scientifically Validating Measurable Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses.Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):1507. doi: 10.3390/ani13091507. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174544 Free PMC article. Review.
-
GLAD Scale for Ranking Welfare of Horses on Arrival after Transport to Slaughterhouses.Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;13(9):1465. doi: 10.3390/ani13091465. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174502 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review on the Link between Animal Welfare and Antimicrobial Use in Captive Animals.Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;12(8):1025. doi: 10.3390/ani12081025. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454272 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scientific Assessment of the Welfare of Trapped Mammals-Key Considerations for the Use of the Sharp and Saunders Humaneness Assessment Model.Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;12(3):402. doi: 10.3390/ani12030402. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35158725 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J. Extending the “Five Domains” model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Anim. Welfare. 2015;24:241–253. doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.241. - DOI
-
- Fraser D., Duncan I.J.H. “Pleasures”, “pains” and animal welfare; towards a natural history of affect. Anim. Welfare. 1998;7:383–396.
-
- Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in Its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell; Oxford, UK: 2008.
-
- . Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. Farm Animal Welfare Council; London, UK: 2009. pp. 243–254.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources