Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;11(3):246-257.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1048815. Epub 2015 May 29.

A Longitudinal Investigation of Relational Catalyst Support of Goal Strivings

Jennifer M Tomlinson  1 , Brooke C Feeney  2 , Meredith Van Vleet  2
Affiliations

A Longitudinal Investigation of Relational Catalyst Support of Goal Strivings

Jennifer M Tomlinson et al. J Posit Psychol. 2016.

Abstract

The goal of this work was to test a theoretical model of relational catalyst support provision that promotes thriving in non-adverse times. We tested a pathway proposed by Feeney and Collins (2014) that explains how relational catalyst support in the context of close relationships might lead to thriving. We proposed that once relational catalyst support has been received, it functions through the mechanisms of being perceived to be responsive to one's needs and promoting perceived capability. Perceived capability should promote indices of thriving including self-esteem, goal accomplishment, growth, and specific and general availability of support. This model was supported in two studies of married couples using observational and longitudinal methods surrounding the support of goal-strivings. Results indicate that (a) partner support of goal-strivings predicted important indicators of thriving over time, and (b) both received and perceived relational catalyst support work together and play important roles in predicting these outcomes.

Keywords: goals; perceived partner responsiveness; relational catalyst support; relationships; self-growth; thriving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed theoretical model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study 1 path analyses testing the theoretical model. *p<.05. **p<.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study 2 pooled path analyses testing the theoretical model. *p<.05. **p<.01.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bolger N, Amarel D. Effects of support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:458–475. - PubMed
    1. Bolger N, Zuckerman A, Kessler RC. Invisible support and adjustments to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;79:953–961. - PubMed
    1. Canevello A, Crocker J. Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;99:78–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;98:310–357. - PubMed
    1. Collins NL, Feeney BC. A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support-seeking and caregiving in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:1053–1073. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources