The neural integration of speaker and message
- PMID: 18052777
- DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054
The neural integration of speaker and message
Abstract
When do listeners take into account who the speaker is? We asked people to listen to utterances whose content sometimes did not match inferences based on the identity of the speaker (e.g., "If only I looked like Britney Spears" in a male voice, or "I have a large tattoo on my back" spoken with an upper-class accent). Event-related brain responses revealed that the speaker's identity is taken into account as early as 200-300 msec after the beginning of a spoken word, and is processed by the same early interpretation mechanism that constructs sentence meaning based on just the words. This finding is difficult to reconcile with standard "Gricean" models of sentence interpretation in which comprehenders initially compute a local, context-independent meaning for the sentence ("semantics") before working out what it really means given the wider communicative context and the particular speaker ("pragmatics"). Because the observed brain response hinges on voice-based and usually stereotype-dependent inferences about the speaker, it also shows that listeners rapidly classify speakers on the basis of their voices and bring the associated social stereotypes to bear on what is being said. According to our event-related potential results, language comprehension takes very rapid account of the social context, and the construction of meaning based on language alone cannot be separated from the social aspects of language use. The linguistic brain relates the message to the speaker immediately.
Similar articles
-
The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:121-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.077. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 19900421
-
Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an FMRI study.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Nov;21(11):2085-99. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21161. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19016606
-
On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: insights from event-related brain potentials.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Apr;19(4):605-16. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.605. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17381252
-
Common neural basis for phoneme processing in infants and adults.J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1375-87. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304714. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15509385 Review.
-
Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension.Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 May 2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006. PMID: 16651019 Review.
Cited by
-
The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024 May;25(5):289-312. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00802-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38609551 Review.
-
A predictive coding model of the N400.Cognition. 2024 May;246:105755. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105755. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Cognition. 2024. PMID: 38428168
-
Does Foreign-Accented Speech Affect Credibility? Evidence from the Illusory-Truth Paradigm.J Cogn. 2024 Feb 19;7(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.353. eCollection 2024. J Cogn. 2024. PMID: 38405636 Free PMC article.
-
The vocal side of empathy: neural correlates of pain perception in spoken complaints.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Dec 27;19(1):nsad075. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad075. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 38102388 Free PMC article.
-
Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):104-121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02355-6. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 37580454 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources