Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):59.
doi: 10.3390/bs13010059.

Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors

Affiliations

Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors

Jian Li et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Student engagement plays a significant role in promoting student learning outcomes in the higher education context. The goal of this meta-analysis was to investigate factors influencing student engagement in higher education institutions in different contexts. The meta-analysis integrated data from 93,188 participants and 148 effects across studies to address this issue. The meta-analysis revealed 14 factors affecting students’ learning participation. The classification was based on internal and external factors, aiming to explore the main factors influencing students’ intention, behavior, and process of learning participation. The external influencing factors with moderate correlations were the teacher-student relationship (R = 0.456, p < 0.001) and positive teacher behavior (R = 0.419, p < 0.001). Additionally, the main external influencing factors were partnership (R = 0.174, p < 0.001), environmental support (R = −0.028), negative teacher behavior (R = −0.064), and negative learning behavior (R = −0145), which were all negatively correlated with learning participation. The results also indicated that factors influencing student engagement can be divided into two categories: promoting factors and hindering factors. The promoting factors include students’ positive emotion, positive learning behavior, positive teacher behavior, the teacher-student relationship and partnership, students’ learning and thinking ability, the support of learning resources, students’ individual and personality characteristics, and teaching factors. The hindering factors include lack of environmental support, negative student behavior, and negative teacher behavior. Further, conceptual and practical implications are discussed in relation to these findings.

Keywords: higher education; international higher education; meta-analysis; student engagement; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Factors influencing student engagement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart used to identify studies for detailed analysis of student engagement and learning outcomes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot analysis of publication bias.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Astin A.W. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 1984;25:297–308.
    1. Appleton J.J., Christenson S.L., Furlong M.J. Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychol. Sch. 2008;45:369–386. doi: 10.1002/pits.20303. - DOI
    1. Coates H. The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Qual. High. Educ. 2005;11:25–36. doi: 10.1080/13538320500074915. - DOI
    1. Arguedas M., Daradoumis T., Xhafa F. Analyzing How Emotion Awareness Influences Students’ Motivation, Engagement, Self-Regulation and Learning Outcome. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2016;19:87–103.
    1. Kahu E.R., Nelson K. Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2018;37:58–71. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197. - DOI

Grants and funding

This research was funded by National Social Science Foundation Youth Project in Education “Study on Process Tracking and Effect Evaluation of Policy Implementation of Excellent Teacher Plan in Ministry-affiliated Normal Universities” (Project No.: CIA220282).

LinkOut - more resources