Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0119313.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119313. eCollection 2015.

Obesity and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies

Jiang-Wei Sun  1 , Long-Gang Zhao  1 , Yang Yang  1 , Xiao Ma  1 , Ying-Ying Wang  1 , Yong-Bing Xiang  1
Affiliations
Review

Obesity and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies

Jiang-Wei Sun et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies have reported inconsistent association between obesity and risk of bladder cancer, and the dose-response relationship between them has not been clearly defined.

Methods: We carried out a meta-analysis to summarize available evidence from epidemiological studies on this point. Relevant articles were identified by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases through September 30, 2014. We pooled the relative risks from individual studies using random-effect model, and the dose-response relationship was estimated by using restricted cubic spline model.

Results: Fifteen cohort studies with 38,072 bladder cancer cases among 14,201,500 participants were included. Compared to normal weight, the pooled relative risks and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of bladder cancer were 1.07(1.01-1.14) and 1.10(1.06-1.14) for preobese and obesity, with moderate (I² = 37.6%, P = 0.029) and low (I² = 15.5%, P = 0.241) heterogeneities between studies, respectively. In a dose-response meta-analysis, body mass index (BMI) was associated with bladder cancer risk in a linear fashion (P(non-linearity) = 0.467) and the risk increased by 4.2% for each 5 kg/m2 increase. No significant publication bias was found (P = 0.912 for Begg's test, P = 0.712 for Egger's test).

Conclusions: Findings from this dose-response meta-analysis suggest obesity is associated with linear-increased risk of bladder cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the study selection for the meta-analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot of preobese and risk of bladder cancer.
Squares indicate study-specific relative risks (size of the square reflects the study-specific statistical weight, i.e., the inverse of the variance); horizontal lines represent 95% CIs; the diamond indicates the summary relative risk estimate with its 95% CI. CI, confidence interval.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Forest plot of obesity and risk of bladder cancer.
Squares indicate study-specific relative risks (size of the square reflects the study-specific statistical weight, i.e., the inverse of the variance); horizontal lines represent 95% CIs; the diamond indicates the summary relative risk estimate with its 95% CI. CI, confidence interval.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Dose-response relationships between body mass index and the relative risk of bladder cancer.
Shaded area represents 95% confidence limits for fitted curve. P = 0.467 for non-linearity, which indicates no curvilinear association.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cancer IAFR. Globocan 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Lyon, France: IARC; 2013.
    1. Pelucchi C, Bosetti C, Negri E, Malvezzi M, La Vecchia C. Mechanisms of disease: the epidemiology of bladder cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3: 327–340. - PubMed
    1. Vainio H, Bianchini F. Weight control and physical activity. IARC; 2002. - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Zhou M, Whitlock G, Yang G, Offer A, Hui G, et al. Esophageal cancer and body mass index: Results from a prospective study of 220,000 men in China and a meta-analysis of published studies. Int J Cancer. 2008;122: 1604–1610. - PubMed
    1. Aune D, Greenwood DC, Chan DS, Vieira R, Vieira AR, Navarro RD, et al. Body mass index, abdominal fatness and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Oncol. 2012;23: 843–852. 10.1093/annonc/mdr398 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the fund of Shanghai Health Bureau Key Disciplines and Specialties Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.