What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
- PMID: 9858756
- DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Abstract
What roles do mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine systems play in reward? Do they mediate the hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli? Do they mediate hedonic reward learning and associative prediction? Our review of the literature, together with results of a new study of residual reward capacity after dopamine depletion, indicates the answer to both questions is 'no'. Rather, dopamine systems may mediate the incentive salience of rewards, modulating their motivational value in a manner separable from hedonia and reward learning. In a study of the consequences of dopamine loss, rats were depleted of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum by up to 99% using 6-hydroxydopamine. In a series of experiments, we applied the 'taste reactivity' measure of affective reactions (gapes, etc.) to assess the capacity of dopamine-depleted rats for: 1) normal affect (hedonic and aversive reactions), 2) modulation of hedonic affect by associative learning (taste aversion conditioning), and 3) hedonic enhancement of affect by non-dopaminergic pharmacological manipulation of palatability (benzodiazepine administration). We found normal hedonic reaction patterns to sucrose vs. quinine, normal learning of new hedonic stimulus values (a change in palatability based on predictive relations), and normal pharmacological hedonic enhancement of palatability. We discuss these results in the context of hypotheses and data concerning the role of dopamine in reward. We review neurochemical, electrophysiological, and other behavioral evidence. We conclude that dopamine systems are not needed either to mediate the hedonic pleasure of reinforcers or to mediate predictive associations involved in hedonic reward learning. We conclude instead that dopamine may be more important to incentive salience attributions to the neural representations of reward-related stimuli. Incentive salience, we suggest, is a distinct component of motivation and reward. In other words, dopamine systems are necessary for 'wanting' incentives, but not for 'liking' them or for learning new 'likes' and 'dislikes'.
Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
Similar articles
-
The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):391-431. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007. PMID: 17072591 Review.
-
Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):E255-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101920108. Epub 2011 Jun 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21670308 Free PMC article.
-
'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.Physiol Behav. 2009 Jul 14;97(5):537-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.044. Epub 2009 Mar 29. Physiol Behav. 2009. PMID: 19336238 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A neural computational model of incentive salience.PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000437. Epub 2009 Jul 17. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009. PMID: 19609350 Free PMC article.
-
Positive Affect: Nature and brain bases of liking and wanting.Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Jun;39:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021. PMID: 33748351 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Explaining dopamine through prediction errors and beyond.Nat Neurosci. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01705-4. Online ahead of print. Nat Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39054370 Review.
-
The Mesocortical System Encodes the Strength of Subsequent Force Generation.Neurosci Insights. 2024 May 30;19:26331055241256948. doi: 10.1177/26331055241256948. eCollection 2024. Neurosci Insights. 2024. PMID: 38827248 Free PMC article.
-
Neurobiological foundations and clinical relevance of effort-based decision-making.Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00890-x. Online ahead of print. Brain Imaging Behav. 2024. PMID: 38819540 Review.
-
Methylphenidate, but not citalopram, decreases impulsive choice in rats performing a temporal discounting task.Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 8;15:1385502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1385502. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38779546 Free PMC article.
-
The rostromedial tegmental nucleus gates fat overconsumption through ventral tegmental area output in male rats.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Apr 3. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01855-w. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024. PMID: 38570645
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources