Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7377.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.7377.

Survival outcome and predictors of WHO grade 2 and 3 insular gliomas: A classification based on the tumor spread

Affiliations

Survival outcome and predictors of WHO grade 2 and 3 insular gliomas: A classification based on the tumor spread

Bowen Xue et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to identify if clinical features and survival outcomes of insular glioma patients are associated with our classification based on the tumor spread.

Methods: Our study included 283 consecutive patients diagnosed with histological grade 2 and 3 insular gliomas. A new classification was proposed, and tumors restricted to the paralimbic system were defined as type 1. When tumors invaded the limbic system (referred to as the hippocampus and its surrounding structures in this study) simultaneously, they were defined as type 2. Tumors with additional internal capsule involvement were defined as type 3.

Results: Tumors defined as type 3 had a higher age at diagnosis (p = 0.002) and a higher preoperative volume (p < 0.001). Furthermore, type 3 was more likely to be diagnosed as IDH wild type (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of Ki-67 index (p = 0.015) and a lower rate of gross total resection (p < 0.001). Type 1 had a slower tumor growth rate than type 2 (mean 3.3%/month vs. 19.8%/month; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the extent of resection (HR 0.259, p = 0.004), IDH status (HR 3.694, p = 0.012), and tumor spread type (HR = 1.874, p = 0.012) as independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Tumor grade (HR 2.609, p = 0.008), the extent of resection (HR 0.488, p = 0.038), IDH status (HR 2.225, p = 0.025), and tumor spread type (HR 1.531, p = 0.038) were significant in predicting progression-free survival (PFS).

Conclusion: The current study proposes a classification of the insular glioma according to the tumor spread. It indicates that the tumors defined as type 1 have a relatively better nature and biological characteristics, and those defined as type 3 can be more aggressive and refractory. Besides its predictive value for prognosis, the classification has potential value in formulating surgical strategies for patients with insular gliomas.

Keywords: classification; insular glioma; limbic system; oncology; paralimbic system; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial or non‐financial interests to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic diagrams of the proposed classification. Every single row represents a demonstrative case. Type 1A represents a purely insular glioma, and type 1B is accompanied by an orbitofrontal cortex or temporal pole involved. Type 2A mainly invaded the structures surrounding the hippocampus such as the amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus while type 2B invaded the hippocampus. Type 3A invaded the internal capsule and type 3B had an additional thalamus involved.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves show the p value of both overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) using log‐rank testing. (A, B) Histopathology has prognostic value in OS and PFS. (C, D) The 2021 WHO classification shows predictive value in both OS and PFS. (E–H) The prognostic value of the proposed classification.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of Yasargil's and Berger's classification. (A, B) The prognostic role of Yasargil's classification in OS and PFS. (C, D) The prognostic role of Berger's classification in OS and PFS.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The individualized prediction models for OS and PFS in lower‐grade insular gliomas. (A) Prognostic nomogram to predict the 1, 3, and 5‐year survival probabilities. (B) Prognostic nomogram to predict the 1, 3, and 5‐year progression‐free survival probabilities.

Similar articles

References

    1. Delion M, Mercier P. Microanatomical study of the insular perforating arteries. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(10):1991‐1997; discussion 7‐8. Epub 2014/07/06. doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2167-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shelley BP, Trimble MR. The insular lobe of Reil—its anatamico‐functional, behavioural and neuropsychiatric attributes in humans—a review. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2004;5(4):176‐200. Epub 2004/11/16. doi:10.1080/15622970410029933 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ture U, Yasargil DC, Al‐Mefty O, Yasargil MG. Topographic anatomy of the insular region. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(4):720‐733. Epub 1999/04/08. doi:10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0720 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tramo MJ, Loftus WC, Thomas CE, Green RL, Mott LA, Gazzaniga MS. Surface area of human cerebral cortex and its gross morphological subdivisions: in vivo measurements in monozygotic twins suggest differential hemisphere effects of genetic factors. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;7(2):292‐302. Epub 1995/04/01. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.292 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yasargil MG, Reeves JD. Tumours of the limbic and paralimbic system. Acta Neurochir. 1992;116(2–4):147‐149. Epub 1992/01/01. doi:10.1007/BF01540867 - DOI - PubMed

Substances