Consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots for last-mile delivery: Technological and health perspectives
- PMID: 36186388
- PMCID: PMC9521669
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953370
Consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots for last-mile delivery: Technological and health perspectives
Abstract
The unprecedented outbreak of the novel coronavirus has led to a great shift toward online retailing and accelerated the need for contactless delivery. This study investigates how technological and health belief factors influence consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots (ADRs). Anchored in four behavioral theories [i.e., technology acceptance model, health belief model, perceived value (VAL) theory and trust theory], a synthesized model is developed. A total of 500 valid responses were collected through an online questionnaire in Singapore, and structural equation modeling was conducted to examine the responses. The results revealed that perceived ease of use (EOU), perceived usefulness (UFN), perceived susceptibility (SUS), perceived severity (SEV), self-efficacy (SEL) and cues to action (CUE) have a positive and significant influence on consumers' perceptions of the value of ADRs. The total effect analysis also showed that perceived VAL strongly affects consumer acceptance of ADRs. Academically, this study introduces both technological and health belief factors to explain consumer acceptance of ADRs. It also provides recommendations for policymakers and autonomous delivery robot developers on policy formulation, public communication, product design and infrastructure development.
Keywords: COVID-19; autonomous delivery robots; health belief model; perceived trust; perceived value; technology acceptance model.
Copyright © 2022 Yuen, Cai, Lim and Wang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Application of the extended value-belief-norm (VBN) theory to understand consumers' intention to use autonomous delivery vehicles (ADVs).Heliyon. 2023 Sep 17;9(9):e20244. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20244. eCollection 2023 Sep. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37809410 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling Consumer Acceptance and Usage Behaviors of m-Health: An Integrated Model of Self-Determination Theory, Task-Technology Fit, and the Technology Acceptance Model.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 25;11(11):1550. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111550. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37297689 Free PMC article.
-
Cruise transport service usage post COVID-19: The health belief model application.Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Sep;111:185-196. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021. PMID: 36568356 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32499740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A meta-analysis of technology acceptance in healthcare from the consumer's perspective.Health Mark Q. 2024 Apr-Jun;41(2):192-213. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2024.2316425. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Health Mark Q. 2024. PMID: 38421028 Review.
Cited by
-
Research on the Frontier and Prospect of Service Robots in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry Based on International Core Journals: A Review.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;13(7):560. doi: 10.3390/bs13070560. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37504007 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abdullah A. Z. (2021). Robots to Deliver Food in Jurong East as part of Trial Involving New NTU Laboratory. Singapore: CNA.
-
- Alonso F., Faus M., Esteban C., Useche S. A. (2021). Is there a predisposition towards the use of new technologies within the traffic field of emerging countries? The case of the Dominican Republic. Electronics 10:1208. 10.3390/electronics10101208 - DOI
-
- Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14 396–402. 10.1177/002224377701400320 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources