Robotic Chef Versus Human Chef: The Effects of Anthropomorphism, Novel Cues, and Cooking Difficulty Level on Food Quality Prediction
- PMID: 35910296
- PMCID: PMC9309233
- DOI: 10.1007/s12369-022-00896-9
Robotic Chef Versus Human Chef: The Effects of Anthropomorphism, Novel Cues, and Cooking Difficulty Level on Food Quality Prediction
Abstract
Robots have been increasingly common in hospitality and tourism, especially being favored under the threat of COVID-19. However, people generally do not think robots are appropriate for cooking food in hotels and restaurants, possibly because they hold low quality predictions for robot-cooked food. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing people's quality prediction for robot-cooked food. In three experiments, participants viewed pictures of human and robotic chefs and dishes cooked by them, and then made food quality predictions and rated their perceptions of the chefs. The results showed that participants predicted the foods cooked by robotic chefs were above average quality; however, they consistently held lower food quality prediction for robotic chefs than human chefs, regardless of dishes' cooking difficulty level, novel cues in chefs and food, or the anthropomorphism level of robotic chefs. The results also showed that increasing the appearance of robotic chefs from low or medium to high anthropomorphism, or enabling robotic chefs to cook high cooking difficulty level food could promote food quality prediction. These results revealed the current acceptance of robot-cooked food, suggesting possible ways to improve food quality predictions.
Keywords: Anthropomorphism; Cooking difficulty level; Food quality prediction; Novel cues; Robotic chef; ‘Like-me’ hypothesis.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 5](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 6](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 7](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 8](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9309233/bin/12369_2022_896_Fig8_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
Chefs' attitudes toward healthful food preparation are more positive than their food science knowledge and practices.J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Feb;98(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00041-8. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998. PMID: 12515417
-
Mastication-Enhanced Taste-Based Classification of Multi-Ingredient Dishes for Robotic Cooking.Front Robot AI. 2022 May 4;9:886074. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.886074. eCollection 2022. Front Robot AI. 2022. PMID: 35603082 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of two common glandular cell-type cancers (breast and colorectal cancers) in Chinese occupational chefs: a nationwide ecological study in Taiwan.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1363-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01673-3. Epub 2021 Feb 28. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021. PMID: 33646334
-
Estimation of water intake from food moisture in the Japanese diet using a cooking-based conversion factor for water content.J Food Sci. 2021 Feb;86(2):266-275. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15579. Epub 2021 Jan 12. J Food Sci. 2021. PMID: 33438226 Review.
-
Avenues for non-conventional robotics technology applications in the food industry.Food Res Int. 2023 Nov;173(Pt 1):113265. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113265. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Food Res Int. 2023. PMID: 37803578 Review.
Cited by
-
Research on the Frontier and Prospect of Service Robots in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry Based on International Core Journals: A Review.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;13(7):560. doi: 10.3390/bs13070560. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37504007 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ivanov S, Webster C, Berezina K. Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Rev Turismo Desenvolv. 2017;27(28):1501–1517.
-
- Jiang YY, Wen J. Effects of COVID-19 on hotel marketing and management: a perspective article. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2020;32(8):2563–2573. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-03-2020-0237. - DOI
-
- Kim S, Kim J, Badu-Baiden F, Giroux M, Choi Y. Preference for robot service or human service in hotels? Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021;93:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102795. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources