The impact of COVID-19 on fertility behaviour and intentions in a middle income country
- PMID: 34990459
- PMCID: PMC8735619
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261509
The impact of COVID-19 on fertility behaviour and intentions in a middle income country
Abstract
The COVID Pandemic may affect fertility behaviour and intentions in many ways. Restrictions on service provision reduce access to family planning services and increase fertility in the short term. By contrast, the economic uncertainty brought about by the pandemic and its impact on mental health and well-being may reduce fertility. These various pathways have been explored in the context of high income countries such as the United States and Western Europe, but little is known about middle income countries. In this paper we asses the impact of the COVID pandemic on fertility intentions and behaviour in the Republic of Moldova, a middle income country in Eastern Europe, using the Generations and Gender Survey. This survey was conducted partially before and partially after the onset of the pandemic in 2020, allowing for detailed comparisons of individual circumstances. The results indicate that the pandemic reduced the used of intrauterine devices, and increased the use of male condoms, but with no overall decrease in contraceptive use. Conversely individuals interviewed after the onset of the pandemic were 34.5% less likely to be trying to conceive, although medium term fertility intentions were unchanged. Indicators therefore suggest that in the medium term fertility intentions may not be affected by the pandemic but restricted access to contraception requiring medical consultation and a decrease in short-term fertility intentions could disrupt short term family planning.
Conflict of interest statement
No authors have competing interests.
Figures
![Fig 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8735619/bin/pone.0261509.g001.gif)
![Fig 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8735619/bin/pone.0261509.g002.gif)
![Fig 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8735619/bin/pone.0261509.g003.gif)
![Fig 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8735619/bin/pone.0261509.g004.gif)
Similar articles
-
Fertility and population policy in two counties in China 1980-1991.J Biosoc Sci. 2000 Jan;32(1):125-40. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000001255. J Biosoc Sci. 2000. PMID: 10676064
-
Women's income profile as a key indicator of women's status for the understanding of changing fertility behaviour in rural Kenya.Genus. 1990 Jul-Dec;46(3-4):31-43. Genus. 1990. PMID: 12343332
-
Declining realisation of reproductive intentions with age.Hum Reprod. 2019 Oct 2;34(10):1906-1914. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez150. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31560763
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Contraceptive prevalence, reproductive health and our common future.Contraception. 1991 Mar;43(3):201-27. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90141-2. Contraception. 1991. PMID: 2036793 Review.
Cited by
-
Baby Bump or Baby Slump? COVID-19, Lockdowns, and their Effects on Births in Australia.SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jan 5;25:101604. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101604. eCollection 2024 Mar. SSM Popul Health. 2024. PMID: 38292050 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported condom use among Washington State residents prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional analysis of BRFSS data.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e075877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075877. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38128941 Free PMC article.
-
Childcare burden and changes in fertility desires of mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1243907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243907. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 38106382 Free PMC article.
-
Social Climate, Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions: from the Great Recession to the Covid-19 Crisis.Eur J Popul. 2023 Dec 1;39(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s10680-023-09684-1. Eur J Popul. 2023. PMID: 38040874 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between staying at home during the pandemic and the number of conceptions: A national panel data analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0289604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289604. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37566617 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lappegård T, Kristensen AP, Mamelund SE. Covid-19 could generate a baby ‘bust’ in the Nordic countries. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. 2020.
-
- Luppi F, Arpino B, Rosina A. The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Demographic Research. 2020;43:1399–1412. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.47 - DOI
-
- Voicu M, Bădoi D. Fertility and the COVID-19 crisis: do gender roles really matter? European Societies. 2021;23(sup1):S199–S214. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1822537 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical