Individual Differences in Belief in Fake News about Election Fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election
- PMID: 34940110
- PMCID: PMC8698698
- DOI: 10.3390/bs11120175
Individual Differences in Belief in Fake News about Election Fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election
Abstract
Fake news is a serious problem because it misinforms people about important issues. The present study examined belief in false headlines about election fraud after the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Belief in election fraud had dangerous consequences, including the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in January 2021. In the present study, participants rated the truthfulness of true and false headlines about the election, and then completed individual difference measures eight days after the election. Participants with more conservative ideology, greater presidential approval of the outgoing president, greater endorsement of general conspiracy narratives and poorer cognitive reflection demonstrated greater belief in false headlines about election fraud. Additionally, consuming more politically conservative election news was associated with greater belief in false headlines. Identifying the factors related to susceptibility to false claims of election fraud offers a path toward countering the influence of these claims by tailoring interventions aimed at decreasing belief in misinformation and decreasing conspiracy beliefs to those most susceptible.
Keywords: conspiracy beliefs; elections; fake news; misinformation; political ideology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 35002884 Free PMC article.
-
Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot.Memory. 2023 Jan;31(1):137-146. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2127771. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Memory. 2023. PMID: 36170037
-
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1608-1613. doi: 10.1037/xge0000729. Epub 2020 Jan 9. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020. PMID: 31916834
-
The illusory truth effect: A review of how repetition increases belief in misinformation.Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101736. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101736. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Curr Opin Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38113667 Review.
-
The Psychology of Fake News.Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 33736957 Review.
Cited by
-
Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors.Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):319. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01813-9. Epub 2023 Jun 12. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023. PMID: 37333884 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pourquoi croyons-nous aux fake news ?Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 2022 Dec;89(6):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.rhum.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 2022. PMID: 36267475 Free PMC article. Review. French.
-
Fake news: Why do we believe it?Joint Bone Spine. 2022 Jul;89(4):105371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. Epub 2022 Mar 4. Joint Bone Spine. 2022. PMID: 35257865 Free PMC article.
-
Trust, Media Credibility, Social Ties, and the Intention to Share towards Information Verification in an Age of Fake News.Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;12(2):51. doi: 10.3390/bs12020051. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35200302 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mitchell A., Gottfried J., Stocking G., Walker M., Fedeli S. Many Americans Say Made-Up News is a Critical Problem That Needs to Be Fixed. Pew Research Center; Washington, DC, USA: 2019. [(accessed on 15 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/many-americans-say-made-up-news-is...
-
- McDonald K. Unreliable News Sties More than Doubled Their Share of Social Media Engagement in 2020. NewsGuard 2021. [(accessed on 15 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.newsguardtech.com/special-report-2020-engagement-analysis/
-
- Goldstein A. Social Media Engagement with Deceptive Sites Reached Record Highs in 2020. The German Marshall Fund of the United States; Washington, DC, USA: 2021. [(accessed on 15 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.gmfus.org/blog/2021/01/27/social-media-engagement-deceptive-....
-
- Lutzke L., Drummond C., Slovic P., Árvai J. Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2019;58:101964. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources