COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling
- PMID: 34783665
- PMCID: PMC8827037
- DOI: 10.2196/31726
COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling
Erratum in
-
Correction: COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e37841. doi: 10.2196/37841. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35275838 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 vaccines are one of the most effective preventive strategies for containing the pandemic. Having a better understanding of the public's conceptions of COVID-19 vaccines may aid in the effort to promptly and thoroughly vaccinate the community. However, because no empirical research has yet fully explored the public's vaccine awareness through sentiment-based topic modeling, little is known about the evolution of public attitude since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.
Objective: In this study, we specifically focused on tweets about COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson) after vaccines became publicly available. We aimed to explore the overall sentiments and topics of tweets about COVID-19 vaccines, as well as how such sentiments and main concerns evolved.
Methods: We collected 1,122,139 tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines from December 14, 2020, to April 30, 2021, using Twitter's application programming interface. We removed retweets and duplicate tweets to avoid data redundancy, which resulted in 857,128 tweets. We then applied sentiment-based topic modeling by using the compound score to determine sentiment polarity and the coherence score to determine the optimal topic number for different sentiment polarity categories. Finally, we calculated the topic distribution to illustrate the topic evolution of main concerns.
Results: Overall, 398,661 (46.51%) were positive, 204,084 (23.81%) were negative, 245,976 (28.70%) were neutral, 6899 (0.80%) were highly positive, and 1508 (0.18%) were highly negative sentiments. The main topics of positive and highly positive tweets were planning for getting vaccination (251,979/405,560, 62.13%), getting vaccination (76,029/405,560, 18.75%), and vaccine information and knowledge (21,127/405,560, 5.21%). The main concerns in negative and highly negative tweets were vaccine hesitancy (115,206/205,592, 56.04%), extreme side effects of the vaccines (19,690/205,592, 9.58%), and vaccine supply and rollout (17,154/205,592, 8.34%). During the study period, negative sentiment trends were stable, while positive sentiments could be easily influenced. Topic heatmap visualization demonstrated how main concerns changed during the current widespread vaccination campaign.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate public COVID-19 vaccine awareness and awareness trends on social media with automated sentiment-based topic modeling after vaccine rollout. Our results can help policymakers and research communities track public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines and help them make decisions to promote the vaccination campaign.
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccine; sentiment evolution; social media; text mining; topic modeling.
©Luwen Huangfu, Yiwen Mo, Peijie Zhang, Daniel Dajun Zeng, Saike He. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.02.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35275835 Free PMC article.
-
Uncovering the Reasons Behind COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Serbia: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 17;24(11):e42261. doi: 10.2196/42261. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36301673 Free PMC article.
-
Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 21;23(10):e30765. doi: 10.2196/30765. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34581682 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of Select Epidemiological Modeling and the Rise of Population Sentiment Analysis: A Literature Review and COVID-19 Sentiment Illustration.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063230. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35328916 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multi-perspectives systematic review on the applications of sentiment analysis for vaccine hesitancy.Comput Biol Med. 2021 Dec;139:104957. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104957. Epub 2021 Oct 16. Comput Biol Med. 2021. PMID: 34735945 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of ChatGPT and Fine-Tuned Open Pre-Trained Transformers (OPT) Against Widely Used Sentiment Analysis Tools: Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Survey Data.JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jan 25;11:e50150. doi: 10.2196/50150. JMIR Ment Health. 2024. PMID: 38271138 Free PMC article.
-
Using Deep Learning to Identify Linguistic Features that Facilitate or Inhibit the Propagation of Anti- and Pro-Vaccine Content on Social Media.2022 IEEE Int Conf Digit Health IEEE IDCH 2022 (2022). 2022 Jul;2022:107-116. doi: 10.1109/icdh55609.2022.00025. Epub 2022 Aug 24. 2022 IEEE Int Conf Digit Health IEEE IDCH 2022 (2022). 2022. PMID: 37975063 Free PMC article.
-
Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 8;25:e45069. doi: 10.2196/45069. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37552535 Free PMC article.
-
A natural language processing approach for analyzing COVID-19 vaccination response in multi-language and geo-localized tweets.Healthc Anal (N Y). 2023 Nov;3:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.health.2023.100172. Epub 2023 Apr 11. Healthc Anal (N Y). 2023. PMID: 37064254 Free PMC article.
-
Examining thematic and emotional differences across Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube: The case of COVID-19 vaccine side effects.Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107734. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Comput Human Behav. 2023. PMID: 36942128 Free PMC article.
References
-
- COVID-19 vaccines are effective. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. Dec 23, [2021-12-28]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness.html .
-
- D'Souza G, Dowdy D. Rethinking herd immunity and the covid-19 response endgame. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Sep 13, [2021-12-28]. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/what-is-herd-immunity-and-how-can-we-a... .
-
- Hussain A, Tahir A, Hussain Z, Sheikh Z, Gogate M, Dashtipour K, Ali A, Sheikh A. Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of public attitudes on Facebook and Twitter toward covid-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 05;23(4):e26627. doi: 10.2196/26627. https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e26627/ v23i4e26627 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, Gostin LO, Larson HJ, Rabin K, Kimball S, El-Mohandes A. A global survey of potential acceptance of a covid-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225–228. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33082575 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous