Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review
- PMID: 34255668
- PMCID: PMC8299342
- DOI: 10.2196/29080
Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR), realized as head-mounted devices (HMDs), may open up new ways of teaching medical content for low-resource settings. The advantages are that HMDs enable repeated practice without adverse effects on the patient in various medical disciplines; may introduce new ways to learn complex medical content; and may alleviate financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on the use of traditional medical learning materials, like cadavers and other skills lab equipment.
Objective: We examine the effectiveness of AR, MR, and VR HMDs for medical education, whereby we aim to incorporate a global health perspective comprising low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and Cochrane guidelines. Seven medical databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycINFO, Education Resources Information Centre, and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed publications from January 1, 2014, to May 31, 2019. An extensive search was carried out to examine relevant literature guided by three concepts of extended reality (XR), which comprises the concepts of AR, MR, and VR, and the concepts of medicine and education. It included health professionals who took part in an HMD intervention that was compared to another teaching or learning method and evaluated with regard to its effectiveness. Quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education, and A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. We extracted relevant data and aggregated the data according to the main outcomes of this review (knowledge, skills, and XR HMD).
Results: A total of 27 studies comprising 956 study participants were included. The participants included all types of health care professionals, especially medical students (n=573, 59.9%) and residents (n=289, 30.2%). AR and VR implemented with HMDs were most often used for training in the fields of surgery (n=13, 48%) and anatomy (n=4, 15%). A range of study designs were used, and quantitative methods were clearly dominant (n=21, 78%). Training with AR- and VR-based HMDs was perceived as salient, motivating, and engaging. In the majority of studies (n=17, 63%), HMD-based interventions were found to be effective. A small number of included studies (n=4, 15%) indicated that HMDs were effective for certain aspects of medical skills and knowledge learning and training, while other studies suggested that HMDs were only viable as an additional teaching tool (n=4, 15%). Only 2 (7%) studies found no effectiveness in the use of HMDs.
Conclusions: The majority of included studies suggested that XR-based HMDs have beneficial effects for medical education, whereby only a minority of studies were from LMICs. Nevertheless, as most studies showed at least noninferior results when compared to conventional teaching and training, the results of this review suggest applicability and potential effectiveness in LMICs. Overall, users demonstrated greater enthusiasm and enjoyment in learning with XR-based HMDs. It has to be noted that many HMD-based interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-term pilots. To generate relevant evidence in the future, it is key to rigorously evaluate XR-based HMDs with AR and VR implementations, particularly in LMICs, to better understand the strengths and shortcomings of HMDs for medical education.
Keywords: augmented reality; global health; income-limited countries; medical education; virtual reality.
©Sandra Barteit, Lucia Lanfermann, Till Bärnighausen, Florian Neuhann, Claudia Beiersmann. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (https://games.jmir.org), 08.07.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Virtual and augmented reality in biomedical engineering.Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Jul 31;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01138-3. Biomed Eng Online. 2023. PMID: 37525193 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What is the Current State of Extended Reality Use in Otolaryngology Training? A Scoping Review.Laryngoscope. 2023 Feb;133(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/lary.30174. Epub 2022 May 12. Laryngoscope. 2023. PMID: 35548939 Review.
-
Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Nov;15(11):1895-1905. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32725398 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Apr 13;10(2):e29594. doi: 10.2196/29594. JMIR Serious Games. 2022. PMID: 35416789 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Simul Healthc. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000636. Epub 2022 Feb 9. Simul Healthc. 2023. PMID: 35136005
Cited by
-
Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05777-5. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39044186 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immersive virtual reality for interdisciplinary trauma management - initial evaluation of a training tool prototype.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05764-w. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39026193 Free PMC article.
-
A 3-D interactive microbiology laboratory via virtual reality for enhancing practical skills.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63601-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38834815 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual reality-based simulation learning on geriatric oral health care for nursing students: a pilot study.BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 28;24(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04249-y. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38807116 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mixed Reality as a Digital Visualisation Solution for the Head and Neck Tumour Board: Application Creation and Implementation Study.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 31;16(7):1392. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071392. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38611070 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . WHO Guidelines Sexual and Reproductive Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019. WHO Guideline Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening; pp. 1–124. - PubMed
-
- Barré J, Michelet D, Truchot J, Jolivet E, Recanzone T, Stiti S, Tesnière A, Pourcher G. Virtual reality single-port sleeve gastrectomy training decreases physical and mental workload in novice surgeons: an exploratory study. Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1309–1316. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03680-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barteit S, Jahn A, Banda SS, Bärnighausen Till, Bowa A, Chileshe G, Guzek D, Jorge MM, Lüders S, Malunga G, Neuhann F. E-learning for medical education in Sub-Saharan Africa and low-resource settings: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 09;21(1):e12449. doi: 10.2196/12449. https://www.jmir.org/2019/1/e12449/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Classification of digital health interventions v1.0 - A shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health. World Health Organization. 2018. [2021-06-29]. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/mhealth/classificatio...
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous