Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods
- PMID: 33997247
- PMCID: PMC8095182
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods
Abstract
Background: Intersectionality is a theoretical framework rooted in the premise that human experience is jointly shaped by multiple social positions (e.g. race, gender), and cannot be adequately understood by considering social positions independently. Used widely in qualitative studies, its uptake in quantitative research has been more recent.
Objectives: To characterize quantitative research applications of intersectionality from 1989 to mid-2020, to evaluate basic integration of theoretical frameworks, and to identify innovative methods that could be applied to health research.
Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles indexed within Scopus, Medline, ProQuest Political Science and Public Administration, and PsycINFO. Original English-language quantitative or mixed-methods research or methods papers that explicitly applied intersectionality theoretical frameworks were included. Experimental studies on perception/stereotyping and measures development or validation studies were excluded. We extracted data related to publication, study design, quantitative methods, and application of intersectionality.
Results: 707 articles (671 applied studies, 25 methods-only papers, 11 methods plus application) met inclusion criteria. Articles were published in journals across a range of disciplines, most commonly psychology, sociology, and medical/life sciences; 40.8% studied a health-related outcome. Results supported concerns among intersectionality scholars that core theoretical tenets are often lost or misinterpreted in quantitative research; about one in four applied articles (26.9%) failed to define intersectionality, while one in six (17.5%) included intersectional position components not reflective of social power. Quantitative methods were simplistic (most often regression with interactions, cross-classified variables, or stratification) and were often misapplied or misinterpreted. Several novel methods were identified.
Conclusions: Intersectionality is frequently misunderstood when bridging theory into quantitative methodology. Further work is required to (1) ensure researchers understand key features that define quantitative intersectionality analyses, (2) improve reporting practices for intersectional analyses, and (3) develop and adapt quantitative methods.
Keywords: Epidemiology; Intersectionality; Research methods; Statistics; Systematic review.
© 2021 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8095182/bin/gr1.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8095182/bin/gr2.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8095182/bin/gr3.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8095182/bin/gr4.gif)
Similar articles
-
Latent variable and clustering methods in intersectionality research: systematic review of methods applications.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;57(2):221-237. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02195-6. Epub 2021 Nov 13. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34773462 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Operationalization of intersectionality in physical activity and sport research: A systematic scoping review.SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 30;14:100808. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100808. eCollection 2021 Jun. SSM Popul Health. 2021. PMID: 34136631 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies.Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113876. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113876. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33866085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review.SSM Popul Health. 2021 Nov 20;16:100977. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100977. eCollection 2021 Dec. SSM Popul Health. 2021. PMID: 34869821 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in mental health and smoking disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual adults in Canada, 2003-2020.SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jul 3;27:101697. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101697. eCollection 2024 Sep. SSM Popul Health. 2024. PMID: 39072350 Free PMC article.
-
Unequal uptake of skilled maternal health care services in Ethiopia: cross-sectional data analyses informed by the intersectionality theory.BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 23;14(7):e077532. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077532. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39043587 Free PMC article.
-
The concept of intersectionality in bioethics: a systematic review.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 23;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01057-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 38783289 Free PMC article.
-
The intersecting effects of race, wealth, and education on AIDS incidence, mortality, and case-fatality rate: a Brazilian cohort study of 28.3 million individuals.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 10:rs.3.rs-4314004. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4314004/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 38766107 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics.J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jun;154:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104653. Epub 2024 May 10. J Biomed Inform. 2024. PMID: 38734158
References
-
- Agénor M., Pérez A.E., Koma J.W., Abrams J.A., McGregor A.J., Ojikutu B.O. Sexual orientation identity, race/ethnicity, and lifetime HIV testing in a national probability sample of U.S. women and men: An intersectional approach. LGBT Health. 2019;6(6):306–318. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Axelsson Fisk S., Mulinari S., Wemrell M., Leckie G., Perez Vicente R., Merlo J. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Sweden: An intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy. SSM - Population Health. 2018;4:334–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ballo J.G. Labour market participation for young people with disabilities: The impact of gender and higher education. Work, Employment & Society. 2020;34(2):336–355. doi: 10.1177/0950017019868139. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous