Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 30:13:1089-1099.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S275414. eCollection 2020.

Cyber Dating Violence Prevention Programs in Universal Populations: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Cyber Dating Violence Prevention Programs in Universal Populations: A Systematic Review

Nuria Galende et al. Psychol Res Behav Manag. .

Abstract

Although the technological revolution of recent decades has produced undeniable advances, it has also generated problems derived from new forms of human communication, especially among the younger population. This is the case with cyber dating violence, a problem that affects between 12% and 56% of young couples, making the need for preventive intervention patently evident. This study attempts to fill a gap in the literature in this field, carrying out a systematic review of universal cyber dating violence prevention programs, analyzing their characteristics and the evidence provided of their effectiveness. Following the PRISMA method, only 3 programs met the inclusion criteria: the DARSI program, the Dat-e Adolescence program and the Brief Incremental Theory of Personality (ITP) adolescent dating violence prevention program. All were reported to be effective, based on different indicators. Given the small body of work published to date and the limitations of the aforementioned programs, future research should aim to design and validate a greater number of programs that serve as tools for addressing this problem in a timely manner, in order to avoid not only the serious consequences it has for victims, but also its escalation towards adulthood.

Keywords: cyber abuse; preventive interventions; relationships; teenagers; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the review (n is the number of records/studies). Note: PRISMA figure adapted from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.61 Creative Commons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reed LA, Tolman RM, Ward LM. Snooping and sexting: digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women. 2016;22(13):1556–1576. doi:10.1177/1077801216630143 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Prete A, Redon S. Las redes sociales virtuales: espacios de socialización y definición de identidad. Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad. 2020;19(1):86–96. doi:10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol19-Issue1-fulltext-1834 - DOI
    1. Romo-Tobón RJ, Vázquez-Sánchez V, Rojas-Solís JL, Alvídrez S. Cyberbullying y ciberviolencia de pareja en alumnado de una universidad privada mexicana. Propós Represent. 2020;8(2):303.
    1. Martínez-Ferrer B, Ruiz DM. Dependencia de las redes sociales virtuales y violencia escolar en adolescentes. Int J Devl Ed Psychol. 2017;2(1):105–114.
    1. Espinar E, González MJ. Jóvenes en las redes sociales virtuales: un análisis exploratorio de las diferencias de género. Feminismo/s. 2009;14:87–106.