Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
- PMID: 31916834
- DOI: 10.1037/xge0000729
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
Abstract
What role does deliberation play in susceptibility to political misinformation and "fake news"? The Motivated System 2 Reasoning (MS2R) account posits that deliberation causes people to fall for fake news, because reasoning facilitates identity-protective cognition and is therefore used to rationalize content that is consistent with one's political ideology. The classical account of reasoning instead posits that people ineffectively discern between true and false news headlines when they fail to deliberate (and instead rely on intuition). To distinguish between these competing accounts, we investigated the causal effect of reasoning on media truth discernment using a 2-response paradigm. Participants (N = 1,635 Mechanical Turkers) were presented with a series of headlines. For each, they were first asked to give an initial, intuitive response under time pressure and concurrent working memory load. They were then given an opportunity to rethink their response with no constraints, thereby permitting more deliberation. We also compared these responses to a (deliberative) 1-response baseline condition where participants made a single choice with no constraints. Consistent with the classical account, we found that deliberation corrected intuitive mistakes: Participants believed false headlines (but not true headlines) more in initial responses than in either final responses or the unconstrained 1-response baseline. In contrast-and inconsistent with the Motivated System 2 Reasoning account-we found that political polarization was equivalent across responses. Our data suggest that, in the context of fake news, deliberation facilitates accurate belief formation and not partisan bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Cognition. 2019. PMID: 29935897
-
An initial accuracy focus reduces the effect of prior exposure on perceived accuracy of news headlines.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 5;5(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00257-y. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020. PMID: 33151449 Free PMC article.
-
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32521507 Review.
-
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020. PMID: 33026546 Free PMC article.
-
The Psychology of Fake News.Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 33736957 Review.
Cited by
-
Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society.PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0303183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303183. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38820281 Free PMC article.
-
Misinformation does not reduce trust in accurate search results, but warning banners may backfire.Sci Rep. 2024 May 14;14(1):10977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61645-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38744967 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Affective Empathy on Online News Belief: The Moderated Mediation of State Empathy and News Type.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;14(4):278. doi: 10.3390/bs14040278. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38667074 Free PMC article.
-
Susceptibility to poor arguments: The interplay of cognitive sophistication and attitudes.Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr 24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01564-1. Online ahead of print. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 38656632
-
The distorting effects of producer strategies: Why engagement does not reveal consumer preferences for misinformation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2315195121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315195121. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38412133 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources