Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e014451.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014451. Epub 2019 Dec 14.

Prefrontal Cortex Regulates Chronic Stress-Induced Cardiovascular Susceptibility

Affiliations

Prefrontal Cortex Regulates Chronic Stress-Induced Cardiovascular Susceptibility

Derek Schaeuble et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background The medial prefrontal cortex is necessary for appropriate appraisal of stressful information, as well as coordinating visceral and behavioral processes. However, prolonged stress impairs medial prefrontal cortex function and prefrontal-dependent behaviors. Additionally, chronic stress induces sympathetic predominance, contributing to health detriments associated with autonomic imbalance. Previous studies identified a subregion of rodent prefrontal cortex, infralimbic cortex (IL), as a key regulator of neuroendocrine-autonomic integration after chronic stress, suggesting that IL output may prevent chronic stress-induced autonomic imbalance. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that the IL regulates hemodynamic, vascular, and cardiac responses to chronic stress. Methods and Results A viral-packaged small interfering RNA construct was used to knockdown vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGluT1) and reduce glutamate packaging and release from IL projection neurons. Male rats were injected with a vGluT1 small interfering RNA-expressing construct or GFP (green fluorescent protein) control into the IL and then remained as unstressed controls or were exposed to chronic variable stress. IL vGluT1 knockdown increased heart rate and mean arterial pressure reactivity, while chronic variable stress increased chronic mean arterial pressure only in small interfering RNA-treated rats. In another cohort, chronic variable stress and vGluT1 knockdown interacted to impair both endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasoreactivity ex vivo. Furthermore, vGluT1 knockdown and chronic variable stress increased histological markers of fibrosis and hypertrophy. Conclusions Knockdown of glutamate release from IL projection neurons indicates that these cells are necessary to prevent the enhanced physiological responses to stress that promote susceptibility to cardiovascular pathophysiology. Ultimately, these findings provide evidence for a neurobiological mechanism mediating the relationship between stress and poor cardiovascular health outcomes.

Keywords: blood pressure; heart rate; heart‐brain relationships; vascular function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The spread of individual lentiviral injections was traced on photomicrographs and overlaid onto atlas templates from Swanson40 to depict the localization of vesicular glutamate transporter 1 knockdown in experiment 1 (A). Lentiviral injections targeted to the infralimbic cortex with minimal spread to the prelimbic cortex (B). White arrows indicate dorsal and ventral boundaries of the infralimbic cortex. Immunolabeling of green fluorescent protein (green) and vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (magenta) indicated a high degree of co‐localization (white arrows) on infralimbic cortex projections in green fluorescent protein controls (C). Knockdown of vesicular glutamate transporter 1 with small interfering RNA treatment decreased vesicular glutamate transporter 1 co‐localization with green fluorescent protein on infralimbic cortex projections (D). Scale bars: (B) 100 μm, (C,D) 10 μm. Numbers indicate distance rostral to bregma in millimeters. AC indicates anterior cingulate; fa, anterior forceps of the corpus callosum; IL, infralimbic cortex; PL, prelimbic cortex.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chronic stress led to no differences in circadian home cage activity (n= 7–8/group) (A). Although, total activity counts were altered (see text). Circadian heart rate disruption occurred with siRNA, CVS, and CVS siRNA (B). Circadian heart rate was lower in the No CVS siRNA and CVS GFP groups compared with No CVS GFP. Furthermore, CVS siRNA circadian heart rate was increased relative to both No CVS siRNA and CVS GFP. ****P<0.0001 No CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, †††† P<0.0001 CVS GFP vs No CVS GFP, ‡‡‡ P<0.001 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP, §§ P<0.01 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA. CVS, chronic variable stress; D, dark cycle; GFP, green fluorescent protein; L, light cycle; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chronic stress and siRNA treatment (n=8/group) interacted leading to altered circadian mean arterial pressure (A). Analysis of cumulative arterial pressure indicated that CVS, only in siRNA‐treated rats, increased chronic mean arterial pressure (B), systolic arterial pressure (C), and diastolic arterial pressure (D). *P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, **P<0.01 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP, †††† P<0.0001 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP, P<0.05 No CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, § P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP. AUC indicates area under the curve; CVS, chronic variable stress; D, dark cycle; GFP, green fluorescent protein; L, light cycle; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Chronic stress as well as CVS siRNA increased circadian pulse pressure (A). Cumulative pulse pressure was increased in CVS exposed rats, with CVS siRNA rats experiencing the greatest chronic pulse pressure (B). *P<0.05 CVS GFP vs No CVS GFP, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, †††† P<0.0001 CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, ‡‡‡‡ P<0.0001 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, § P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP. AUC indicates area under the curve; CVS, chronic variable stress; D, dark cycle; GFP, green fluorescent protein; L, light cycle; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In response to acute restraint, both siRNA and CVS (n=8/group) increased heart rate reactivity and impaired recovery (A). Cumulative acute heart rate responses were also elevated by siRNA and CVS, but CVS siRNA rats had the greatest overall heart rate response (B). Chronically stressed rats, both GFP and siRNA treated, had increased mean arterial pressure reactivity and impaired recovery (C). Analysis of cumulative restraint‐induced pressor responses indicated effects of both siRNA and CVS (D). *P<0.05 CVS GFP vs No CVS GFP, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, P<0.05 No CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, § P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, II P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP. AUC indicates area under the curve; CVS, chronic variable stress; GFP, green fluorescent protein; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The spread of individual lentiviral injections was traced on photomicrographs and overlaid onto atlas templates from Swanson40 to depict the localization of vesicular glutamate transporter 1 knockdown in experiment 2. White arrows indicate dorsal and ventral boundaries of the IL. Numbers indicate distance rostral to bregma in millimeters. AC indicates anterior cingulate; IL, infralimbic cortex; PL, prelimbic cortex.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Aortic tissue from CVS siRNA animals (n=7/group) had impaired endothelial‐dependent vasoconstriction (A). Both CVS and siRNA impaired endothelial‐independent vasoreactivity but the CVS siRNA group had the greatest impairment (B). Endothelial‐dependent vasorelaxation was impaired only in the CVS siRNA group (C), while endothelial‐independent relaxation was impaired in CVS GFP and CVS siRNA tissue (D). *P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs No CVS siRNA, P<0.05 CVS siRNA vs CVS GFP, § P<0.05 No CVS siRNA vs No CVS GFP, II P<0.05 CVS GFP vs No CVS GFP. CVS indicates chronic variable stress; GFP, green fluorescent protein; M, molar; siRNA, small interfering RNA.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Verhoeff‐van Gieson stain was used to visualize elastin (dark brown) in aortic tissue of No CVS GFP (A) and CVS siRNA (B) rats. Greater thickness of the tunica media is indicated by white arrows. Masson Trichrome was used to stain collagen (blue) in aortic tissue of No CVS GFP (C) and CVS siRNA (D) animals. White arrows indicate increased collagen density in the tunica adventitia. Wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to Alexa 488 (green) was used to visualize cardiomyocyte membranes (E). Binarized myocyte images (F) were used to quantify myocyte surface area. Scale bars: (A through D) 50 μm, (E) 10 μm. *Denotes the lumen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:463–475. - PubMed
    1. Myers B, McKlveen JM, Herman JP. Glucocorticoid actions on synapses, circuits, and behavior: implications for the energetics of stress. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35:180–196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wardle J, Chida Y, Gibson EL, Whitaker KL, Steptoe A. Stress and adiposity: a meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies. Obesity. 2011;19:771–778. - PubMed
    1. Grippo AJ, Johnson AK. Stress, depression and cardiovascular dysregulation: a review of neurobiological mechanisms and the integration of research from preclinical disease models. Stress. 2009;12:1–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binder EB, Nemeroff CB. The CRF system, stress, depression and anxiety—insights from human genetic studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:574–588. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types