Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;22(3):439-452.
doi: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e38.

Changes in Biomarker Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Their Prognostic Value

Affiliations

Changes in Biomarker Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Their Prognostic Value

Ji Won Woo et al. J Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: There is cumulative evidence that changes in biomarker status occur frequently during the metastatic progression of breast cancer and affect treatment response. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of biomarker changes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and its impact on prognosis.

Methods: A total of 152 patients diagnosed with MBC at the time of initial diagnosis or during post-surgical follow-up were included. Changes in biomarker status in MBCs, their frequency according to various metastatic sites, tumor characteristics, and their association with patient survival were analyzed.

Results: Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 status changed in 9 (6.0%), 40 (26.3%), 12 (7.9%), and 29 (19.1%) patients, respectively. ER, PR, and HER2 mainly showed positive to negative conversion, whereas Ki-67 changed mostly from a low to high index. There were no differences in the frequencies of biomarker changes according to the metastatic sites. As for ER and HER2, cases with negative conversion showed low expression levels in the primary tumor. Survival analyses indicated that a positive to negative conversion of ER was an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with primary ER-positive breast cancer.

Conclusion: Changes in biomarker status are not rare, and usually occur in an unfavorable direction in breast cancer metastases. Negative conversion of ER status is a predictor of poor prognosis. Thus, it is beneficial to evaluate changes in biomarker status in MBC not only for the purpose of determining treatment options but also for prognostication of patients.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Breast neoplasms; Estrogens; Neoplasm metastasis; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A representative image of biomarker conversion. The left column is from the primary tumor, and the right column is from the metastatic tumor. ER (A, B) and PR (C, D) show negative conversion in the metastatic tumor. HER2 (E, F) exhibits positive conversion. Ki-67 index (G, H) reveals alteration from a low to high index. (A-H) Immunohistochemical staining, ×200 magnification.
ER = estrogen receptor; PR = progesterone receptor; HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for OS according to estrogen receptor status change. Patients with persistent ER-negative tumors (blue line) show decreased OS compared to those with persistent ER-positive tumors (green line) (p < 0.001, log-rank test). ER-negative conversion group (yellow line) shows poor OS compared to persistent ER-positive group (green line) (p = 0.001, log-rank test).
OS = overall survival; ER = estrogen receptor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brewster AM, Hortobagyi GN, Broglio KR, Kau SW, Santa-Maria CA, Arun B, et al. Residual risk of breast cancer recurrence 5 years after adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1179–1183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717. - PubMed
    1. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van 't Veer LJ. Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:591–602. - PubMed
    1. Hoefnagel LD, van de Vijver MJ, van Slooten HJ, Wesseling P, Wesseling J, Westenend PJ, et al. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schrijver WA, Suijkerbuijk KP, van Gils CH, van der Wall E, Moelans CB, van Diest PJ. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:568–580. - PubMed