The impact of facility characteristics on Merkel cell carcinoma outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 31473294
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.058
The impact of facility characteristics on Merkel cell carcinoma outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Previous work has suggested that facility-level characteristics, such as case volume and academic affiliation, are associated with patient survival for rare malignancies. Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine skin cancer with high mortality and rising incidence. The effect of facility characteristics on MCC outcomes is not yet established.
Objective: We aimed to investigate whether facility academic affiliation or case volume was associated with MCC patient survival.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of US adult MCC cases diagnosed during 2004-2014 in the National Cancer Database.
Results: Both facility academic affiliation (P < .001) and case volume (P < .001) were significantly associated with patient survival. The 5-year survival of patients treated at academic facilities was 63.0% (standard error [SE] 1.7) and that of a propensity score- matched cohort of patients treated at nonacademic facilities was 53.4% (SE 1.9). The 5-year survival of patients treated at high-case volume facilities was 67.4% (SE 2.1) and that of a propensity score-matched cohort of patients treated at low- and intermediate-case volume facilities was 58.6% (SE 2.0).
Limitations: Disease-specific survival and local recurrence data were not available.
Conclusion: Treatment of MCC at academic and high-volume centers is associated with significantly improved patient survival. Further studies evaluating comorbidities and disease-specific survival are needed to establish whether experienced centers have improved outcomes in MCC treatment.
Keywords: Merkel cell carcinoma; NCDB; academic affiliation; case volume; regionalization; survival.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization.Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Feb 13;316(3):86. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02817-4. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024. PMID: 38349538
-
Effect of host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment variables on outcomes in a large cohort with Merkel cell carcinoma.JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jul;150(7):716-23. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8116. JAMA Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24807619 Free PMC article.
-
Improved survival in women versus men with merkel cell carcinoma.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Feb;84(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.034. Epub 2020 May 15. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 32423829
-
Merkel cell carcinoma in East Yorkshire: A case series and literature review of current management.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 May;68(5):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.021. Epub 2015 Jan 6. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015. PMID: 25595515 Review.
-
Merkel cell carcinoma.Ann Oncol. 2010 Oct;21 Suppl 7:vii81-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq366. Ann Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20943647 Review.
Cited by
-
High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization.Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Feb 13;316(3):86. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02817-4. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024. PMID: 38349538
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical