Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Sep;56(7):882-898.
doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1568375. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Couples' Sexual Communication and Dimensions of Sexual Function: A Meta-Analysis

Allen B Mallory  1   2 , Amelia M Stanton  3 , Ariel B Handy  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Couples' Sexual Communication and Dimensions of Sexual Function: A Meta-Analysis

Allen B Mallory et al. J Sex Res. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Research and clinical data have shown that couples with sexual problems report a lack of sexual communication. However, no published meta-analyses have evaluated the relationship between sexual communication and sexual function. This meta-analysis examines the correlation between couples' sexual communication and dimension of sexual function across 48 studies. Sexual communication was positively associated with sexual desire (r = .16), sexual arousal (r = .21), lubrication (r = .17), orgasm (r = .23), erectile function (r = .19), less pain (r = .12), and overall sexual function (r = .35). The effect sizes for sexual desire (r = .21; r = .12) and orgasm (r = .26; r = .16) were higher for women than for men. For overall sexual function, studies with married participants (r = .47) had a larger effect size than studies with participants with multiple relationship types (r = .31) or than studies with dating participants (r = .11). Effect sizes were larger for studies conducted outside of the United States (r = .39) compared to studies conducted in the United States (r = .12). We discuss the importance of addressing the relationship between sexual communication and sexual function, as well as future directions for research in this area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow Diagram of Article Screening Process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Althof SE, Meston CM, Perelman MA, Handy AB, Kilimnik CD, & Stanton AM (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14, 1365–1371. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.08.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Amidu N, Owiredu WK, Woode E, Addai-Mensah O, Gyasi-Sarpong KC, & Alhassan A (2010). Prevalence of male sexual dysfunction among Ghanaian populace: Myth or reality? International Journal of Impotence Research, 22, 337–342. doi:10.1038/ijir.2010.24 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Applebaum GT (1983). Lesbian sexual function and dysfunction. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (8314171).
    1. Bartlik B, & Goldberg J (2000). Female sexual arousal disorder In Leiblum SR & Rosen RC, (Eds). Principles and practice of sex therapy, (3rd ed., pp. 85–117). New York: Guilford Press.

Publication types