Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 23;15(11):2330.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112330.

Direct and Indirect Effects of Belief in a Just World and Supervisor Support on Burnout via Bullying

Affiliations

Direct and Indirect Effects of Belief in a Just World and Supervisor Support on Burnout via Bullying

Pascale Desrumaux et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the mediating role of workplace bullying in how supervisor support and belief in a just world (BJW) are related to emotional exhaustion. A cross-sectional quantitative study using anonymous self-report questionnaires was conducted with 434 workers in France. The model was tested using a path analysis. First, the results revealed that BJW and support from the hierarchy were negatively related to emotional exhaustion. BJW and supervisor support were also negatively related to workplace bullying. Finally, harassment at work was positively related to emotional exhaustion. More generally, the results showed that social support from one's superior and BJW were directly and indirectly related to emotional exhaustion via bullying at work. Our model thus suggests that BJW and supervisor support can be protective resources against bullying and exhaustion. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the present study, as well as some avenues for future research.

Keywords: belief in a just world; burnout; mediation; supervisor support; workplace bullying.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the path analysis. Note: Standardized coefficients are reported. All paths are significant (p < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maslach C., Jackson S. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 2nd ed. Consulting Psychologists Press; Palo Alto, CA, USA: 1986.
    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Sanz-Vergel A.I. Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2014;1:389–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235. - DOI
    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007;22:309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115. - DOI
    1. Baillien E., Camps J., Van den Broeck A., Stouten J., Godderis L., Sercu M., De Witte H. An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind: Conflict escalation into workplace bullying and the role of distributive conflict behavior. J. Bus. Ethics. 2016;137:415–429. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2563-y. - DOI
    1. Hauge L.J., Skogstad A., Einarsen S. Relationships between work environment quality and bullying: Results of a representative study. Work Stress. 2007;21:220–242. doi: 10.1080/02678370701705810. - DOI