Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 30327264
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.09.005
Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Sexual difficulties, and sexual pain in particular, represent a global health issue for women, and their prevalence has been shown to differ across countries.
Aim: To review the existing literature on the prevalence of female sexual difficulties and sexual pain worldwide measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included were peer-reviewed publications indicating prevalence rates of female sexual difficulties based on the FSFI and cutoff values. Studies with samples limited to a certain age group or health condition were excluded.
Main outcome measure: The outcome measure includes cutoff values and prevalence rates for sexual difficulties and sexual pain, as well as sample characteristics.
Results: 22 studies conducted in 11 countries were included. These examined samples from the community, patient records, health care staff, or the Internet. Various prevalence cutoff values were applied. Prevalence rates of overall sexual difficulties ranged between 5.5% and 77%. For sexual pain, rates from 3% to 95.5% were found. A comparison between countries was restricted due to differences in sample size, sample type, and applied cutoffs. Representative community samples using comparable cutoffs found that 5.8-63.3% of women experience general sexual difficulty and 6-31.6% experience sexual pain.
Clinical implications: Sexual difficulties and sexual pain are prevalent in all examined countries, and despite restrictions to interpretability, the large prevalence rates point to the necessity of further clinical research.
Strength & limitations: Many studies had to be excluded because of missing data. The comparison of studies is descriptive, and not all regions worldwide are represented. Nevertheless, results of the review were useful to derive recommendations for reporting of future studies using the FSFI.
Conclusion: This review is the first comparison of prevalence studies based on the FSFI. It reflects the extent of available research and limitations in comparability. Koops TU, Briken P. Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2018;15:1591-1599.
Keywords: FSFI; Female Sexual Function; Prevalence; Sexual Pain; Systematic Review.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Age-related prevalence rates of sexual difficulties, sexual dysfunctions, and sexual distress in heterosexual women: results from an online survey in flanders.J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):424-35. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12725. Epub 2014 Oct 27. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25345486
-
A Survey of Female Sexual Functioning in the General Dutch Population.J Sex Med. 2017 Jul;14(7):937-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.676. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 28673436
-
Different Characteristics of the Female Sexual Function Index in a Sample of Sexually Active and Inactive Women.J Sex Med. 2017 Sep;14(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.07.008. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 28859872
-
What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction?J Sex Med. 2006 Jul;3(4):589-595. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00241.x. J Sex Med. 2006. PMID: 16839314 Review.
-
Are aspects of study design associated with the reported prevalence of female sexual difficulties?Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1297. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17980879 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of sexual dysfunction according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria with avoidance of and discomfort during sex in a population-based sample.Sex Med. 2023 Jul 14;11(3):qfad037. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad037. eCollection 2023 Jun. Sex Med. 2023. PMID: 37465531 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Psychodynamic Conflicts and Level of Personality Functioning in Women Diagnosed With Vaginismus and Dyspareunia.Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:687369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687369. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34248792 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical