Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
- PMID: 30107788
- PMCID: PMC6092796
- DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3
Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
Abstract
Background: Systematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic review process. It involves a systematic search for studies and aims for a transparent report of study identification, leaving readers clear about what was done to identify studies, and how the findings of the review are situated in the relevant evidence. Information specialists and review teams appear to work from a shared and tacit model of the literature search process. How this tacit model has developed and evolved is unclear, and it has not been explicitly examined before. The purpose of this review is to determine if a shared model of the literature searching process can be detected across systematic review guidance documents and, if so, how this process is reported in the guidance and supported by published studies.
Method: A literature review. Two types of literature were reviewed: guidance and published studies. Nine guidance documents were identified, including: The Cochrane and Campbell Handbooks. Published studies were identified through 'pearl growing', citation chasing, a search of PubMed using the systematic review methods filter, and the authors' topic knowledge. The relevant sections within each guidance document were then read and re-read, with the aim of determining key methodological stages. Methodological stages were identified and defined. This data was reviewed to identify agreements and areas of unique guidance between guidance documents. Consensus across multiple guidance documents was used to inform selection of 'key stages' in the process of literature searching.
Results: Eight key stages were determined relating specifically to literature searching in systematic reviews. They were: who should literature search, aims and purpose of literature searching, preparation, the search strategy, searching databases, supplementary searching, managing references and reporting the search process.
Conclusions: Eight key stages to the process of literature searching in systematic reviews were identified. These key stages are consistently reported in the nine guidance documents, suggesting consensus on the key stages of literature searching, and therefore the process of literature searching as a whole, in systematic reviews. Further research to determine the suitability of using the same process of literature searching for all types of systematic review is indicated.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
N/A.
Consent for publication
N/A.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;6(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0625-1. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29179733 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24066664 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27875992 Free PMC article.
-
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24022476 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Global trends in Cryptococcus and its interactions with the host immune system: a bibliometric analysis.Front Immunol. 2024 May 7;15:1397338. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1397338. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38774865 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Nov 27;5:100168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100168. eCollection 2023 Dec. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023. PMID: 38746570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CyPVICS: A framework to prevent or minimise cybersickness in immersive virtual clinical simulation.Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(8):e29595. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29595. eCollection 2024 Apr 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38665591 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024. PMID: 38355285 Free PMC article.
-
The Implementation Success of Technology-Based Counseling in Dementia Care: Scoping Review.JMIR Aging. 2024 Jan 25;7:e51544. doi: 10.2196/51544. JMIR Aging. 2024. PMID: 38271050 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
-
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). IQWiG Methods Resources. 7 Information retrieval 2014 [Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK385787/.
-
- NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/de.... - PubMed
-
- Sampson M. MJ, Lefebvre C, Moher D, Grimshaw J. Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: PRESS; 2008. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources