Sentiment, Contents, and Retweets: A Study of Two Vaccine-Related Twitter Datasets
- PMID: 29911966
- PMCID: PMC6004971
- DOI: 10.7812/TPP/17-138
Sentiment, Contents, and Retweets: A Study of Two Vaccine-Related Twitter Datasets
Abstract
Introduction: Social media platforms are important channels through which health education about the utility and safety of vaccination is conducted.
Objective: To investigate if tweets with different sentiments toward vaccination and different contents attract different levels of Twitter users' engagement (retweets).
Methods: A stratified random sample (N = 1425) of 142,891 #vaccine tweets (February 4, 2010, to November 10, 2016) was manually coded. All 201 tweets with 100 or more retweets from 194,259 #vaccineswork tweets (January 1, 2014, to April 30, 2015) were manually coded. Regression models were applied to identify factors associated with retweet frequency.
Results: Among #vaccine tweets, provaccine tweets (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.5836, 95% confidence interval = 1.2130-2.0713, p < 0.001) and antivaccine tweets (adjusted prevalence ratio = 4.1280, 95% confidence interval = 3.1183-5.4901, p < 0.001) had more retweets than neutral tweets. No significant differences occurred in retweet frequency for content categories among antivaccine tweets. Among 411 links in provaccine tweets, Twitter (53; 12.9%), content curator Trap.it (14; 3.4%), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (8; 1.9%) ranked as the top 3 domains. Among 325 links in antivaccine tweets, social media links were common: Twitter (44; 14.9%), YouTube (25; 8.4%), and Facebook (10; 3.4%). Among highly retweeted #vaccineswork tweets, the most common theme was childhood vaccinations (40%; 81/201); 21% mentioned global vaccination improvement/efforts (42/201); 29% mentioned vaccines can prevent outbreaks and deaths (58/201).
Conclusion: Engaging social media key opinion leaders to facilitate health education about vaccination in their tweets may allow reaching a wider audience online.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35275835 Free PMC article.
-
The Association Between Dissemination and Characteristics of Pro-/Anti-COVID-19 Vaccine Messages on Twitter: Application of the Elaboration Likelihood Model.JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Jun 27;2(1):e37077. doi: 10.2196/37077. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022. PMID: 35783451 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Driving the Popularity and Virality of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Text Mining and Data Visualization Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 3;7(12):e32814. doi: 10.2196/32814. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34665761 Free PMC article.
-
Using Machine Learning to Compare Provaccine and Antivaccine Discourse Among the Public on Social Media: Algorithm Development Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 24;7(6):e23105. doi: 10.2196/23105. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34185004 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Twitter Activity and Engagement From Annual Meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society of Interventional Radiology.Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Apr 5. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33831529 Review.
Cited by
-
Public Discourse, User Reactions, and Conspiracy Theories on the X Platform About HIV Vaccines: Data Mining and Content Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 3;26:e53375. doi: 10.2196/53375. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38568723 Free PMC article.
-
A Snapshot of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse Related to Ethnic Minority Communities in the United Kingdom Between January and April 2022: Mixed Methods Analysis.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 26;8:e51152. doi: 10.2196/51152. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38530334 Free PMC article.
-
Tracking the structure and sentiment of vaccination discussions on Mumsnet.Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01155-z. Epub 2023 Nov 18. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023. PMID: 38026264 Free PMC article.
-
Global Misinformation Spillovers in the Vaccination Debate Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multilingual Twitter Study.JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 May 24;3:e44714. doi: 10.2196/44714. JMIR Infodemiology. 2023. PMID: 37223965 Free PMC article.
-
Media Data and Vaccine Hesitancy: Scoping Review.JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 10;2(2):e37300. doi: 10.2196/37300. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022. PMID: 37113443 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm—an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3778–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Luthy KE, Beckstrand RL, Callister LC, Cahoon S. Reasons parents exempt children from receiving immunizations. J Sch Nurs. 2012 Apr;28(2):153–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840511426578. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dredze M, Broniatowski DA, Smith MC, Hilyard KM. Understanding vaccine refusal: Why we need social media now. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):550–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gastañaduy PA, Budd J, Fisher N, et al. A measles outbreak in an underimmunized Amish community in Ohio. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1343–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1602295. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. Social media update 2016 [Internet] Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2016. Nov 11, [cited 2016 Nov 21]. Available from: www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous