The spread of true and false news online
- PMID: 29590045
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559
The spread of true and false news online
Abstract
We investigated the differential diffusion of all of the verified true and false news stories distributed on Twitter from 2006 to 2017. The data comprise ~126,000 stories tweeted by ~3 million people more than 4.5 million times. We classified news as true or false using information from six independent fact-checking organizations that exhibited 95 to 98% agreement on the classifications. Falsehood diffused significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth in all categories of information, and the effects were more pronounced for false political news than for false news about terrorism, natural disasters, science, urban legends, or financial information. We found that false news was more novel than true news, which suggests that people were more likely to share novel information. Whereas false stories inspired fear, disgust, and surprise in replies, true stories inspired anticipation, sadness, joy, and trust. Contrary to conventional wisdom, robots accelerated the spread of true and false news at the same rate, implying that false news spreads more than the truth because humans, not robots, are more likely to spread it.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Comment in
-
The world must learn from COVID before diving into a pandemic treaty.Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7853):165-166. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00866-7. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33824523 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Emotions explain differences in the diffusion of true vs. false social media rumors.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(1):22721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01813-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34811397 Free PMC article.
-
Infodemics: Do healthcare professionals detect corona-related false news stories better than students?PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247517. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33690605 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46):e2100786118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100786118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 34750252 Free PMC article.
-
The Psychology of Fake News.Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 33736957 Review.
-
Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 14: Falsehood and Bias.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;168(6):1584-1595. doi: 10.1002/ohn.215. Epub 2023 Feb 17. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 36808631 Review.
Cited by
-
Attraction by pairwise coherence explains the emergence of ideological sorting.PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jul 8;3(7):pgae263. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae263. eCollection 2024 Jul. PNAS Nexus. 2024. PMID: 39081784 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of digital health literacy on online health-related behaviors influenced by internet advertising.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 20;24(1):1949. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19506-6. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39033160 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying the vulnerabilities of the online public square to adversarial manipulation tactics.PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 29;3(7):pgae258. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae258. eCollection 2024 Jul. PNAS Nexus. 2024. PMID: 38994499 Free PMC article.
-
Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation.Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8015):45-53. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07417-w. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Nature. 2024. PMID: 38840013 Review.
-
Virtual lab coats: The effects of verified source information on social media post credibility.PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0302323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302323. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38809822 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
