Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 2;8(2):e021273.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021273.

'Care Under Pressure': a realist review of interventions to tackle doctors' mental ill-health and its impacts on the clinical workforce and patient care

Affiliations

'Care Under Pressure': a realist review of interventions to tackle doctors' mental ill-health and its impacts on the clinical workforce and patient care

Daniele Carrieri et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Mental ill-health is prevalent across all groups of health professionals and this is of great concern in many countries. In the UK, the mental health of the National Health Service (NHS) workforce is a major healthcare issue, leading to presenteeism, absenteeism and loss of staff from the workforce. Most interventions targeting doctors aim to increase their 'productivity' and 'resilience', placing responsibility for good mental health with doctors themselves and neglecting the organisational and structural contexts that may have a detrimental effect on doctors' well-being. There is a need for approaches that are sensitive to the contextual complexities of mental ill-health in doctors, and that do not treat doctors as a uniform body, but allow distinctions to account for particular characteristics, such as specialty, career stage and different working environments.

Methods and analysis: Our project aims to understand how, why and in what contexts support interventions can be designed to minimise the incidence of doctors' mental ill-health. We will conduct a realist review-a form of theory-driven interpretative systematic review-of interventions, drawing on diverse literature sources. The review will iteratively progress through five steps: (1) locate existing theories; (2) search for evidence; (3) select articles; (4) extract and organise data and (5) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions. The analysis will summarise how, why and in what circumstances doctors' mental ill-health is likely to develop and what can remediate the situation. Throughout the project, we will also engage iteratively with diverse stakeholders in order to produce actionable theory.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for our review. Our dissemination strategy will be participatory. Tailored outputs will be targeted to: policy makers; NHS employers and healthcare leaders; team leaders; support organisations; doctors experiencing mental ill-health, their families and colleagues.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017069870.

Keywords: health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shaw B. The doctor’s dilemma: Brentano’s, 1911.
    1. Campbell J, Dussault G, Buchan J, et al. . A universal truth: no health without a workforce. forum report, third global forum on human resources for health, recife, Brazil. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance and World Health Organization, 2013.
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO). National health workforce accounts: a handbook. 2016. http://www.who.int/hrh/documents/brief_nhwfa_handbook/en/.
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Health workforce—data and statistics. 2016. http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/en/ (cited 12 Dec 2017).
    1. Chambers C, Frampton C, Barclay M. Presenteeism in the New Zealand senior medical workforce-a mixed-methods analysis. N Z Med J 2017;130:10–21. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources