Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11374-11379.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704347114. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

Rethinking people's conceptions of mental life

Kara Weisman  1 , Carol S Dweck  2 , Ellen M Markman  1
Affiliations

Rethinking people's conceptions of mental life

Kara Weisman et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

How do people make sense of the emotions, sensations, and cognitive abilities that make up mental life? Pioneering work on the dimensions of mind perception has been interpreted as evidence that people consider mental life to have two core components-experience (e.g., hunger, joy) and agency (e.g., planning, self-control) [Gray HM, et al. (2007) Science 315:619]. We argue that this conclusion is premature: The experience-agency framework may capture people's understanding of the differences among different beings (e.g., dogs, humans, robots, God) but not how people parse mental life itself. Inspired by Gray et al.'s bottom-up approach, we conducted four large-scale studies designed to assess people's conceptions of mental life more directly. This led to the discovery of an organization that differs strikingly from the experience-agency framework: Instead of a broad distinction between experience and agency, our studies consistently revealed three fundamental components of mental life-suites of capacities related to the body, the heart, and the mind-with each component encompassing related aspects of both experience and agency. This body-heart-mind framework distinguishes itself from Gray et al.'s experience-agency framework by its clear and importantly different implications for dehumanization, moral reasoning, and other important social phenomena.

Keywords: agency; animacy; folk theories; mind perception; social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. S2.
Fig. S2.
Mean ratings of the 40 mental capacities for the two entities in studies 1–3. Participants responded on a scale from 0 (not at all capable) to 6 (highly capable). Error bars are nonparametric bootstrapped 95% CIs. Mental capacities are grouped according to their dominant factor loading in study 1: Items that loaded most strongly on factor 1 (body) are in red, on factor 2 (heart) are in blue, and on factor 3 (mind) are in green.
Fig. S3.
Fig. S3.
Mean ratings of the 40 mental capacities for all 21 entities in study 4. Participants responded on a scale from 0 (not at all capable) to 6 (highly capable). Error bars are nonparametric bootstrapped 95% CIs. Mental capacities are grouped according to their dominant factor loading in study 4: Items that loaded most strongly on factor 1 (body) are in red, on factor 2 (heart) are in blue, and on factor 3 (mind) are in green.
Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.
Factor loadings for the 40 mental capacities on the three rotated factors in study 1. Items that loaded most strongly on the body factor are in red; items that loaded most strongly on the heart factor are in blue; and items that loaded most strongly on the mind factor are in green. An interactive version is available online at rpubs.com/kgweisman/bodyheartmind_figureS1.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean ratings of the 40 mental capacities for a subset of the 21 entities in study 4. (Figs. S2 and S3 for mean ratings for the full set of entities in all studies.) Participants responded on a scale from 0 (not at all capable) to 6 (highly capable). Error bars are nonparametric bootstrapped 95% CIs. Mental capacities are grouped according to their dominant factor loading in study 1 (red: body; blue: heart; green: mind). Doing computations was the only item to load negatively on its dominant factor in any study (studies 1–3); in study 4, it loaded positively on its dominant factor (heart).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models.
    Colombatto C, Fleming SM. Colombatto C, et al. Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Apr 13;2024(1):niae013. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae013. eCollection 2024. Neurosci Conscious. 2024. PMID: 38618488 Free PMC article.
  • Consciousness isn't "hard"-it's human psychology that makes it so!
    Berent I. Berent I. Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Apr 3;2024(1):niae016. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae016. eCollection 2024. Neurosci Conscious. 2024. PMID: 38585293 Free PMC article.
  • Aesthetic Motivation Impacts Judgments of Others' Prosociality and Mental Life.
    Agrawal T, Schachner A. Agrawal T, et al. Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Dec 8;7:947-980. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00113. eCollection 2023. Open Mind (Camb). 2023. PMID: 38111474 Free PMC article.
  • Self-discrepancies in mind perception for actual, ideal, and ought selves and partners.
    Jacobs OL, Pazhoohi F, Kingstone A. Jacobs OL, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 13;18(12):e0295515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295515. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38091324 Free PMC article.
  • The Human Affectome.
    Schiller D, Yu ANC, Alia-Klein N, Becker S, Cromwell HC, Dolcos F, Eslinger PJ, Frewen P, Kemp AH, Pace-Schott EF, Raber J, Silton RL, Stefanova E, Williams JHG, Abe N, Aghajani M, Albrecht F, Alexander R, Anders S, Aragón OR, Arias JA, Arzy S, Aue T, Baez S, Balconi M, Ballarini T, Bannister S, Banta MC, Barrett KC, Belzung C, Bensafi M, Booij L, Bookwala J, Boulanger-Bertolus J, Boutros SW, Bräscher AK, Bruno A, Busatto G, Bylsma LM, Caldwell-Harris C, Chan RCK, Cherbuin N, Chiarella J, Cipresso P, Critchley H, Croote DE, Demaree HA, Denson TF, Depue B, Derntl B, Dickson JM, Dolcos S, Drach-Zahavy A, Dubljević O, Eerola T, Ellingsen DM, Fairfield B, Ferdenzi C, Friedman BH, Fu CHY, Gatt JM, de Gelder B, Gendolla GHE, Gilam G, Goldblatt H, Gooding AEK, Gosseries O, Hamm AO, Hanson JL, Hendler T, Herbert C, Hofmann SG, Ibanez A, Joffily M, Jovanovic T, Kahrilas IJ, Kangas M, Katsumi Y, Kensinger E, Kirby LAJ, Koncz R, Koster EHW, Kozlowska K, Krach S, Kret ME, Krippl M, Kusi-Mensah K, Ladouceur CD, Laureys S, Lawrence A, Li CR, Liddell BJ, Lidhar NK, Lowry CA, Magee K, Marin MF, Mariotti V, Martin LJ, Marusak HA, Mayer AV, Merner AR, Minnier J, Moll J, Morrison RG, Moore M, Mouly … See abstract for full author list ➔ Schiller D, et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Mar;158:105450. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024. PMID: 37925091 Free PMC article. Review.
See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM. Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 2007;315:619. - PubMed
    1. Gray K, Knobe J, Sheskin M, Bloom P, Barrett LF. More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101:1207–1220. - PubMed
    1. Gray K, Wegner DM. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition. 2012;125:125–130. - PubMed
    1. Gray K, Jenkins AC, Heberlein AS, Wegner DM. Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:477–479. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gray K, Waytz A, Young L. The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychol Inq. 2012;23:206–215. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources