Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 24:8:300.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00300. eCollection 2017.

Emergence of Functional Flexibility in Infant Vocalizations of the First 3 Months

Affiliations

Emergence of Functional Flexibility in Infant Vocalizations of the First 3 Months

Yuna Jhang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Functional flexibility, as manifest in the use of any word or sentence to express different affective valences on different occasions, is required in linguistic communication and can be said to be an infrastructural property of language. Early infant vocalizations (protophones), believed to be precursors to speech, occur in the first month and are functionally different from non-speech-like signals (e.g., cries and laughs). Oller et al. (2013) showed that infants by 3 months used three different protophone types with a full range of affect as manifest in facial expression, from positive to neutral to negative. These differences in affect were also shown to correspond to different illocutionary functions, unlike fixed signals, or vegetative sounds, which showed functional rigidity. The present study investigated whether infants show functional flexibility in protophones even earlier than the ages studied by Oller et al. (2013). Data were obtained from 6 infants across the first 3 months. Results showed that as early as the first month, infant protophones were already accompanied by variable facial affect valences and continued to be affectively flexible at the later ages. The present study thus documents the very early emergence of an infrastructural property of human communication.

Keywords: affect development; flexible communication; infant vocalization; language development; prelinguistic vocal development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Functional flexibility of protophones in the present study and in Oller et al. (2013). The data in (A–D) are based on a single coding of each utterance. The data from Oller et al. (2013), panels (C,D), are based on a single consensus coding for each utterance. To maximize comparability, the present data as displayed (A,B) are from a single coder, the one who was most experienced among the five coders. Both data sets (A–D) show functional flexibility, but they differ in that positivity was less common and negativity more common in the present data. Regardless of which coder's data from the present study is used for comparison, the pattern of results is similar to that displayed in (A,B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Austin J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
    1. Bigelow A. E., Power M. (2014). Effects of maternal responsiveness on infant responsiveness and behavior in the still-face task. Infancy 19, 558–584. 10.1111/infa.12059 - DOI
    1. Buder E. H., Chorna L. B., Oller D. K., Robinson R. B. (2008). Vibratory regime classification of infant phonation. J. Voice 22, 553–564. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.12.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clay Z., Archbold J., Zuberbühler K. (2015). Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviour. PeerJ 3:e1124. 10.7717/peerj.1124 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources