Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living"
- PMID: 27102171
- PMCID: PMC4810049
- DOI: 10.3390/ani6030021
Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living"
Abstract
The Five Freedoms have had major impact on animal welfare thinking internationally. However, despite clear initial statements that the words 'freedom from' should indicate 'as free as possible from', the Freedoms have come to be represented as absolute or fundamental freedoms, even rights, by some animal advocate and other groups. Moreover, a marked increase in scientific understanding over the last two decades shows that the Freedoms do not capture the more nuanced knowledge of the biological processes that is germane to understanding animal welfare and which is now available to guide its management. For example, the named negative experiences of thirst, hunger, discomfort and pain, and others identified subsequently, including breathlessness, nausea, dizziness, debility, weakness and sickness, can never be eliminated, merely temporarily neutralised. Each one is a genetically embedded element that motivates animals to behave in particular ways to obtain specific life-sustaining resources, avoid or reduce physical harm or facilitate recovery from infection or injury. Their undoubted negativity creates a necessary sense of urgency to respond, without which animals would not survive. Also, the temporary neutralisation of these survival-critical affects does not in and of itself generate positive experience. This questions the commonly held assumption that good animal welfare will result when these internally generated negative affects are minimised. Animals may also experience other negative affects that include anxiety, fear, panic, frustration, anger, helplessness, loneliness, boredom and depression. These situation-related affects reflect animals' perceptions of their external circumstances. Although they are elicited by threatening, cramped, barren and/or isolated conditions, they can often be replaced by positive affects when animals are kept with congenial others in spacious, stimulus-rich and safe environments which provide opportunities for them to engage in behaviours they find rewarding. These behaviours may include environment-focused exploration and food acquisition activities as well as animal-to-animal interactive activities, all of which can generate various forms of comfort, pleasure, interest, confidence and a sense of control. Animal welfare management should aim to reduce the intensity of survival-critical negative affects to tolerable levels that nevertheless still elicit the required behaviours, and should also provide opportunities for animals to behave in ways they find rewarding, noting that poor management of survival-critical affects reduces animals' motivation to utilize such rewarding opportunities. This biologically more accurate understanding provides support for reviewing the adequacy of provisions in current codes of welfare or practice in order to ensure that animals are given greater opportunities to experience positive welfare states. The purpose is to help animals to have lives worth living, which is not possible when the predominant focus of such codes is on survival-critical measures. Finally, an updated characterisation of animal welfare that incorporates this more accurate understanding is presented.
Keywords: animal welfare management; barren environments; enrichment; five domains; five freedoms; lives worth living; negative experiences; positive experiences; quality of life.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4810049/bin/animals-06-00021-g001.gif)
Similar articles
-
The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare.Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):1870. doi: 10.3390/ani10101870. Animals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33066335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".Animals (Basel). 2016 Sep 23;6(10):59. doi: 10.3390/ani6100059. Animals (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27669313 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Positive animal welfare states and encouraging environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):9-16. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926800. Epub 2014 Oct 9. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 24875367 Review.
-
Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926799. Epub 2014 Aug 14. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 24875268 Review.
-
Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include 'quality of life' and related concepts.N Z Vet J. 2011 Nov;59(6):263-71. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.610283. N Z Vet J. 2011. PMID: 22040330 Review.
Cited by
-
An Interactive Feeder to Induce and Assess Emotions from Vocalisations of Chickens.Animals (Basel). 2024 May 6;14(9):1386. doi: 10.3390/ani14091386. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38731390 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Milk-Feeding Frequency and Calcium Gluconate Supplementation on Growth, Health, and Reproductive and Metabolic Features of Holstein Heifers at a Rearing Farm.Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;14(9):1336. doi: 10.3390/ani14091336. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38731339 Free PMC article.
-
The Easiest Becomes the Rule: Beliefs, Knowledge and Attitudes of Equine Practitioners and Enthusiasts Regarding Horse Welfare.Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;14(9):1282. doi: 10.3390/ani14091282. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38731286 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and perception about the welfare and mistreatment of dogs in Brazil.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 19;19(4):e0302317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302317. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38640135 Free PMC article.
-
A methodological approach to compare continuous and instantaneous sampling and two methods to deal with animals out of sight on dairy cattle behavior and interaction with their calf in the first hours post-partum.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Mar 14;11:1360239. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1360239. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38550784 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bayvel A.C.D. The OIE animal welfare strategic initiative—Progress, priorities and prognosis; Proceedings of the Global Conference on Animal Welfare: An OIE Initiative; Paris, France. 23–25 February 2004; Paris, France: Office International des Epizooties (OIE); 2004. pp. 13–17.
-
- . Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. Farm Animal Welfare Council; London, UK: 2009. pp. 243–254.
-
- McCulloch S.P. A critique of FAWC’s five freedoms as a framework for the analysis of animal welfare. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2013;26:959–975. doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7. - DOI
-
- Appleby M.C., Mench J.A., Olsson J.A.S., Hughes B.A., editors. Animal Welfare. 2nd ed. CAB International; Wallingford, UK: 2011.
-
- Webster J., editor. Management and Welfare of Farm Animals. UFAW Farm Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell; Chichester, UK: 2011.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources