Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149990.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149990. eCollection 2016.

Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe

David Rojas-Rueda  1   2   3   4 , Audrey de Nazelle  5 , Zorana J Andersen  6 , Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer  7   8 , Jan Bruha  9 , Hana Bruhova-Foltynova  9 , Hélène Desqueyroux  10 , Corinne Praznoczy  11 , Martina S Ragettli  7   8 , Marko Tainio  12   13 , Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe

David Rojas-Rueda et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Policies that stimulate active transportation (walking and bicycling) have been related to heath benefits. This study aims to assess the potential health risks and benefits of promoting active transportation for commuting populations (age groups 16-64) in six European cities. We conducted a health impact assessment using two scenarios: increased cycling and increased walking. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality related to changes in physical activity level, exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution with a diameter <2.5 μm, as well as traffic fatalities in the cities of Barcelona, Basel, Copenhagen, Paris, Prague, and Warsaw. All scenarios produced health benefits in the six cities. An increase in bicycle trips to 35% of all trips (as in Copenhagen) produced the highest benefits among the different scenarios analysed in Warsaw 113 (76-163) annual deaths avoided, Prague 61 (29-104), Barcelona 37 (24-56), Paris 37 (18-64) and Basel 5 (3-9). An increase in walking trips to 50% of all trips (as in Paris) resulted in 19 (3-42) deaths avoided annually in Warsaw, 11(3-21) in Prague, 6 (4-9) in Basel, 3 (2-6) in Copenhagen and 3 (2-4) in Barcelona. The scenarios would also reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the six cities by 1,139 to 26,423 (metric tonnes per year). Policies to promote active transportation may produce health benefits, but these depend of the existing characteristics of the cities. Increased collaboration between health practitioners, transport specialists and urban planners will help to introduce the health perspective in transport policies and promote active transportation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual framework of active transportation and health.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Number of deaths and Number of deaths adjusted by 100,000 travellers who shifted modes per year, by heath exposure.
Scenarios. A: 35% of all trips by bicycle; B: 50% of all trips walking.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Sensitivity analysis. Number of deaths avoided or postponed per year by 100,000 travellers who shifted modes.
A: Cyclist increment; B: Pedestrians increment. “Linear RR for PA”: Using a linear relative risk function for physical activity (for cycling or walking) as reported by kahlmeier S, et al, 2011; “50% of the trips coming from car trips”: Assume that half of the trips substituted in each scenario come from car trips; “Safety in numbers”: Assuming a fatal accident reduction associated with the increment of the number of pedestrians or cyclist; “Fatal accident risk of the reference city”: Assuming a fatal accident risk similar to the reference city for the scenarios A (fatal accident risk of cyclist in Copenhagen) and B (fatal accident risk of pedestrians in Paris); “European RR function for PM2.5”: Using a relative risk function of PM2.5 and all cause mortality reported in ESCAPE project (Beelen R, et al, 2014); “Fivefold toxicity of PM2.5”: Assuming a fivefold toxicity of PM2.5 from the traffic sources.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. European Environment Agency. The European Environment, State and Outlook 2010, Urban Environment. EEA, European Commission, editors. 2010. Copenhagen.
    1. UNEP. Share the Road: Investment in Walking and Cycling Road Infrastructure. United Nations Environment Programme, editor. 2010. Nairobi.
    1. EPA. Guide to Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures. 2011. US, Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380(9859):2224–2260. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The World Bank, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Transport for Health: The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport. 2014. Washington, DC, The World Bank. Global Road Safety Facility.

Publication types

MeSH terms