Evaluation of an alternating-calorie diet with and without exercise in the treatment of obesity
- PMID: 2667313
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/50.2.248
Evaluation of an alternating-calorie diet with and without exercise in the treatment of obesity
Abstract
This study examined the effects of calorie alternation and exercise on weight loss. Moderately obese women (130-160% of ideal body weight) were randomly assigned to an alternating- or constant-calorie diet with or without aerobic exercise. Both diets provided an average of 1200 kcal/d over a 12-wk period; daily intake of subjects in the alternating-diet condition varied in a prescribed pattern from 600 to 1800 kcal/d. Exercising subjects walked 5 d/wk. All subjects participated in an intensive outpatient behavior-modification program. At the end of the study, exercised subjects had greater reductions in body weight and body fat percentage than did nonexercised subjects. The type of caloric restriction did not affect weight or fat loss. Changes in resting metabolic rate did not differ among groups. Alternating calories was neither beneficial nor detrimental as a weight-loss strategy whereas exercise was clearly beneficial in weight-loss therapy.
Similar articles
-
Effects of a behavioral weight loss program stressing calorie restriction versus calorie plus fat restriction in obese individuals with NIDDM or a family history of diabetes.Diabetes Care. 1995 Sep;18(9):1241-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.9.1241. Diabetes Care. 1995. PMID: 8612437 Clinical Trial.
-
Calorie restriction is more effective for obesity treatment than dietary fat restriction.Ann Behav Med. 1999 Spring;21(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02895031. Ann Behav Med. 1999. PMID: 18425652 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of diet and exercise on common cardiovascular disease risk factors in moderately obese older women.Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;63(2):225-33. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.2.225. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996. PMID: 8561064 Clinical Trial.
-
Exercise and obesity.Sports Med. 1986 Mar-Apr;3(2):89-113. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198603020-00002. Sports Med. 1986. PMID: 3515486 Review.
-
Exercise is not an effective weight loss modality in women.J Am Coll Nutr. 1993 Aug;12(4):363-7. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1993.10718323. J Am Coll Nutr. 1993. PMID: 8409096 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Continuous Energy Restriction among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Nutrients. 2022 May 31;14(11):2315. doi: 10.3390/nu14112315. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35684119 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Nutr. 2022 May 2;9:871682. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871682. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 35586738 Free PMC article.
-
Beneficial effects of intermittent fasting: a narrative review.J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023 Jan;40(1):4-11. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00010. Epub 2022 Apr 4. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 35368155 Free PMC article.
-
A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0258853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258853. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34788298 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intermittent Energy Restriction, Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence in Humans.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;9(5):495. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050495. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33922103 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical