Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;42(5):764-71.
doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

Social Media and Oncology: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Communication Between Physician and Patient

Affiliations
Review

Social Media and Oncology: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Communication Between Physician and Patient

Mark A Lewis et al. Semin Oncol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

The relationship between patient and physician is in flux with the advent of electronic media that are advancing and enhancing communication. We perform a retrospective, current, and forward-looking examination of the technologies by which information is exchanged within the healthcare community. The evolution from e-mail and listservs to blogs and the modern social networks is described, with emphasis on the advantages and pitfalls of each medium, especially in regard to maintaining the standards of privacy and professionalism to which doctors are held accountable. We support the use of contemporary platforms like Twitter and Facebook for physicians to establish themselves as trustworthy online sources of medical knowledge, and anticipate ongoing collaboration between researchers, patients, and their advocates in trial design and accrual.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key Physician Tweeters at 2014 ASCO National Meeting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dizon DS, Graham D, Thompson MA, et al. Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. Journal of oncology practice / American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;8:e114–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kane B, Sands DZ. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 1998;5:104–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fridsma DB, Ford P, Altman RA. Survey of Patient Access to Electronic Mail -Attitudes, Barriers, and Opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assn. 1994:15–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul IM, Levi BH. Metastasis of e-mail at an academic medical center. JAMA pediatrics. 2014;168:290–1. - PubMed
    1. Katzen C, Solan MJ, Dicker AP. E-mail and oncology: a survey of radiation oncology patients and their attitudes to a new generation of health communication. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. 2005;8:189–93. - PubMed