The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: longitudinal findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay Survey
- PMID: 25512431
- PMCID: PMC4618260
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051742
The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: longitudinal findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay Survey
Abstract
Background: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Article 11 Guidelines recommend that health warning labels (HWLs) should occupy at least 50% of the package, but the tobacco industry claims that increasing the size would not lead to further benefits. This article reports the first population study to examine the impact of increasing HWL size above 50%. We tested the hypothesis that the 2009/2010 enhancement of the HWLs in Uruguay would be associated with higher levels of effectiveness.
Methods: Data were drawn from a cohort of adult smokers (≥18 years) participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay Survey. The probability sample cohort was representative of adult smokers in five cities. The surveys included key indicators of HWL effectiveness. Data were collected in 2008/09 (prepolicy: wave 2) and 2010/11 (postpolicy: wave 3).
Results: Overall, 1746 smokers participated in the study at wave 2 (n=1379) and wave 3 (n=1411). Following the 2009/2010 HWL changes in Uruguay (from 50% to 80% in size), all indicators of HWL effectiveness increased significantly (noticing HWLs: OR=1.44, p=0.015; reading HWLs: OR=1.42, p=0.002; impact of HWLs on thinking about risks of smoking: OR=1.66, p<0.001; HWLs increasing thinking about quitting: OR=1.76, p<0.001; avoiding looking at the HWLs: OR=2.35, p<0.001; and reports that HWLs stopped smokers from having a cigarette 'many times': OR=3.42, p<0.001).
Conclusions: The 2009/2010 changes to HWLs in Uruguay, including a substantial increment in size, led to increases of key HWL indicators, thus supporting the conclusion that enhancing HWLs beyond minimum guideline recommendations can lead to even higher levels of effectiveness.
Keywords: Global health; Harm Reduction; Low/Middle income country; Packaging and Labelling.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Similar articles
-
Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico.Salud Publica Mex. 2010;52 Suppl 2(0 2):S206-15. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342010000800016. Salud Publica Mex. 2010. PMID: 21243191 Free PMC article.
-
An examination of the effectiveness of health warning labels on smokeless tobacco products in four states in India: findings from the TCP India cohort survey.BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 13;16(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3899-7. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27964733 Free PMC article.
-
Exposure to and perceptions of health warning labels on nicotine vaping products: findings from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.Addiction. 2019 Oct;114 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):134-143. doi: 10.1111/add.14550. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Addiction. 2019. PMID: 30618081 Free PMC article.
-
Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159245. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27411100 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive and External Validity of a Pre-Market Study to Determine the Most Effective Pictorial Health Warning Label Content for Cigarette Packages.Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1376-81. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv184. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016. PMID: 26377516 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Examining the Effectiveness of the 2012 Canadian Graphic Warning Label Policy Change by Sex, Income, and Education.Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Mar 22;25(4):763-772. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac235. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023. PMID: 36205028 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of an e-cigarette tax on cigarette and e-cigarette use in a middle-income country: a study from Indonesia using a pre-post design.BMJ Open. 2022 May 4;12(5):e055483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055483. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35508336 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived effectiveness of four different cigarette health warning label themes among a sample of urban smokers and non-smokers in China.Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):205-210. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056703. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Tob Control. 2023. PMID: 34400570 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Message Approach and Image Size on Pictorial Health Warning Effectiveness on Cigarette Pack in Indonesia: A Mixed Factorial Experiment.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136854. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34202414 Free PMC article.
-
Quasi-experimental evaluation of Kenya's pictorial health warnings versus Zambia's single text-only warning: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Project.Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):139-145. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056396. Epub 2021 Jun 11. Tob Control. 2023. PMID: 34117097 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control. 2011;20:327–37. - PubMed
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Handbook 12 on Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control. WHO Press; Lyon, France: Geneva: 2008. Methods for Evaluating Tobacco Control Policies.
-
- Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, et al. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy. 2011;102:41–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources