Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Nov;93(11):1076-82.
doi: 10.1177/0022034514549559. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

Risk score algorithm for treatment of persistent apical periodontitis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Risk score algorithm for treatment of persistent apical periodontitis

V S Yu et al. J Dent Res. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Persistent apical periodontitis related to a nonvital tooth that does not resolve following root canal treatment may be compatible with health and may not require further intervention. This research aimed to develop a Deterioration Risk Score (DRS) to differentiate lesions requiring further intervention from lesions likely to be compatible with health. In this cross-sectional study, patient records (2003-2008) were screened for root-filled teeth with periapical radiolucency visible on periapical radiographs taken at treatment and at recruitment at least 4 yr later. The final sample consisted of 228 lesions in 182 patients. Potential demographic and treatment risk factors were screened against 3 categorical outcomes (improved/unchanged/deteriorated), and a multivariate independent multinomial probit regression model was built. A 5-level DRS was constructed by summing values of adjusted regression coefficients in the model, based on predicted probabilities of deterioration. Most lesions (127, 55.7%) had improved over time, while 32 (14.0%) remained unchanged, and 69 (30.3%) had deteriorated. Significant predictors of deterioration were as follows: time since treatment (relative risk [RR]: 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.22, p = .030, rounded beta value = 1, for every year increase after 4 yr), current pain (RR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.48-9.70, p = .005, rounded beta value = 13), sinus tract present (RR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.11-15.29, p = .034, rounded beta value = 14), and lesion size (RR: 7.20, 95% CI: 3.70-14.02, p < .001, rounded beta value = 20). Persistent apical periodontitis with DRS <15 represented very low risk; 15-20, low risk; 21-30, moderate risk; 31-40, high risk; and >40, very high risk. DRS could help the clinician identify persistent apical periodontitis at low risk for deterioration, and it would not require intervention. When validated, this tool could reduce the risk of overtreatment and contribute toward targeted care and better efficiency in the timely management of disease.

Keywords: decision making; endodontics; periapical periodontitis; probability; regression analysis; root canal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model and Deterioration Risk Score performance. Receiver operating characteristic curve of the bootstrap sample compared favorably with that of the original full sample. Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the predicted probabilities, and distribution of apical periodontitis (AP) with predicted risk were described.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Decision tree for intervention of persistent apical periodontitis (AP). Deterioration Risk Score (DRS) for each persistent AP is derived from the sum of risk scores: (a) + (b) + (c) + (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azarpazhooh A, Dao T, Figueiredo R, Krahn M, Friedman S. (2013). A survey of dentists’ preferences for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 39:1226-1233. - PubMed
    1. Burstyn I. (2010). Antepartum risk score predicts adverse birth outcomes.J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:16-20. - PubMed
    1. Byström A, Sundqvist G. (1981). Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321-328. - PubMed
    1. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, et al. (2008). Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase 4: initial treatment. J Endod 34:258-263. - PubMed
    1. European Society of Endodontology (2006). Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39:921-930. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources