Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;10(4):569-76.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu087. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Neural patterns underlying social comparisons of personal performance

Affiliations

Neural patterns underlying social comparisons of personal performance

Michael Lindner et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Humans often evaluate their abilities by comparing their personal performance with that of others. For this process, it is critical whether the comparison turns out in one's favor or against it. Here, we investigate how social comparisons of performance are encoded and integrated on the neural level. We collected functional magnetic resonance images while subjects answered questions in a knowledge quiz that was related to their profession. After each question, subjects received a feedback about their personal performance, followed by a feedback about the performance of a reference group who had been quizzed beforehand. Based on the subjects' personal performance, we divided trials in downward and upward comparisons. We found that upward comparisons correlated with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula. Downward comparisons were associated with increased activation in the ventral striatum (VS), the medial orbitofrontal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). The extent to which subjects outperformed the reference group modulated the activity in the VS and in the dorsal ACC. We suggest that the co-activation of the VS and the dorsal ACC contributes to the integration of downward comparisons into the evaluation of personal performance.

Keywords: downward comparison; fMRI; performance; self-evaluation; social comparison.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Task design of the knowledge quiz for the reference group and the fMRI experiment. Each trial begins with the presentation of the question (3 s), followed by the four-answer alternative (max 5 s, terminated by response). After the subject has made a choice, the chosen answer is displayed for 250 ms. After a jittered interstimulus interval (ISI), the subject sees an accuracy feedback about the personal performance (1.5 s), followed by another ISI. The task for the reference group ends here. In the fMRI experiment, the subject subsequently sees a feedback about the reference group performance (3 s), followed by another jittered ISI.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Main effect of social comparison direction. Neural activations of the contrast of downward greater than upward comparisons are shown as T-maps (P < 0.001, uncorrected, k > 10, for demonstration purposes). The effect of ‘downward > upward’ is displayed as positive T-values (red); the opposite effect of ‘downward < upward’ is displayed as negative T-values (blue). T-values are color-coded as specified by the color bar.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Deviation between personal and reference group performance in downward comparisons. Neural activations in the bilateral VS and the dACC increase with the positive deviation of the personal performance from the reference group performance during downward comparisons. Left, T-maps for downward comparisons modulated by the degree of deviation (P < 0.001, unc., k > 10, for demonstration purposes). T-values are color-coded as specified by the color bar. Right, peri-stimulus time histograms in the respective regions split into lower and upper percentiles of downward comparisons. Colored areas show standard errors of the mean. L, left; R, right; VS, ventral striatum; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • The influence of upward social comparison on retail trading behaviour.
    Andraszewicz S, Kaszás D, Zeisberger S, Hölscher C. Andraszewicz S, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):22713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49648-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38123629 Free PMC article.
  • The neuroscience of social comparison and competition.
    Tor A, Garcia SM. Tor A, et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):920-943. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01107-2. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37286762
  • Effects of acute psychosocial stress on source level EEG power and functional connectivity measures.
    Vanhollebeke G, Kappen M, De Raedt R, Baeken C, van Mierlo P, Vanderhasselt MA. Vanhollebeke G, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 May 31;13(1):8807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35808-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37258794 Free PMC article.
  • Country-level gender inequality is associated with structural differences in the brains of women and men.
    Zugman A, Alliende LM, Medel V, Bethlehem RAI, Seidlitz J, Ringlein G, Arango C, Arnatkevičiūtė A, Asmal L, Bellgrove M, Benegal V, Bernardo M, Billeke P, Bosch-Bayard J, Bressan R, Busatto GF, Castro MN, Chaim-Avancini T, Compte A, Costanzi M, Czepielewski L, Dazzan P, de la Fuente-Sandoval C, Di Forti M, Díaz-Caneja CM, María Díaz-Zuluaga A, Du Plessis S, Duran FLS, Fittipaldi S, Fornito A, Freimer NB, Gadelha A, Gama CS, Garani R, Garcia-Rizo C, Gonzalez Campo C, Gonzalez-Valderrama A, Guinjoan S, Holla B, Ibañez A, Ivanovic D, Jackowski A, Leon-Ortiz P, Lochner C, López-Jaramillo C, Luckhoff H, Massuda R, McGuire P, Miyata J, Mizrahi R, Murray R, Ozerdem A, Pan PM, Parellada M, Phahladira L, Ramirez-Mahaluf JP, Reckziegel R, Reis Marques T, Reyes-Madrigal F, Roos A, Rosa P, Salum G, Scheffler F, Schumann G, Serpa M, Stein DJ, Tepper A, Tiego J, Ueno T, Undurraga J, Undurraga EA, Valdes-Sosa P, Valli I, Villarreal M, Winton-Brown TT, Yalin N, Zamorano F, Zanetti MV; cVEDA; Winkler AM, Pine DS, Evans-Lacko S, Crossley NA. Zugman A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2218782120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2218782120. Epub 2023 May 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37155867 Free PMC article.
  • Neuroanatomical substrates of maximizing tendency in decision-making: a voxel-based morphometric study.
    Zhang H, Wei S, Wang Y, Feng J. Zhang H, et al. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Oct;16(5):1938-1945. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00656-3. Epub 2022 May 19. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022. PMID: 35585446

References

    1. Bault N, Joffily M, Rustichini A, Coricelli G. Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:16044–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackwood NJ, Bentall RP, ffytche DH, Simmons A, Murray RM, Howard RJ. Self-responsibility and the self-serving bias: an fMRI investigation of causal attributions. NeuroImage. 2003;20(2):1076–1085. - PubMed
    1. Blair KS, Otero M, Teng C, et al. Dissociable roles of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) in value representation and optimistic bias. NeuroImage. 2013;78:103–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig ADB. How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10:59–70. - PubMed
    1. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006;31:968–80. - PubMed