Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments
- PMID: 24690082
- PMCID: PMC4021422
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-45
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments
Abstract
Background: Lack of appropriate reporting of methodological details has previously been shown to distort risk of bias assessments in randomized controlled trials. The same might be true for observational studies. The goal of this study was to compare the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment for risk of bias between reviewers and authors of cohort studies included in a published systematic review on risk factors for severe outcomes in patients infected with influenza.
Methods: Cohort studies included in the systematic review and published between 2008-2011 were included. The corresponding or first authors completed a survey covering all NOS items. Results were compared with the NOS assessment applied by reviewers of the systematic review. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using kappa (K) statistics.
Results: Authors of 65/182 (36%) studies completed the survey. The overall NOS score was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the reviewers' assessment (median = 6; interquartile range [IQR] 6-6) compared with those by authors (median = 5, IQR 4-6). Inter-rater reliability by item ranged from slight (K = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.19, 0.48) to poor (K = -0.06, 95% CI = -0.22, 0.10). Reliability for the overall score was poor (K = -0.004, 95% CI = -0.11, 0.11).
Conclusions: Differences in assessment and low agreement between reviewers and authors suggest the need to contact authors for information not published in studies when applying the NOS in systematic reviews.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4021422/bin/1471-2288-14-45-1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4021422/bin/1471-2288-14-45-2.gif)
Similar articles
-
Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability Testing of Quality Assessment Instruments [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Mar. Report No.: 12-EHC039-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Mar. Report No.: 12-EHC039-EF. PMID: 22536612 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):982-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23683848
-
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales.BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 31;2(4):e001368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001368. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 22855629 Free PMC article.
-
The ROBINS-I and the NOS had similar reliability but differed in applicability: A random sampling observational studies of systematic reviews/meta-analysis.J Evid Based Med. 2021 May;14(2):112-122. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12427. Epub 2021 May 18. J Evid Based Med. 2021. PMID: 34002466
-
Reliability Testing of the AHRQ EPC Approach to Grading the Strength of Evidence in Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 May. Report No.: 12-EHC067-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 May. Report No.: 12-EHC067-EF. PMID: 22764383 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Unusual Presentation of Thoracic Chordoma with Spinal Epidural Hematoma: A Rare Case Report and PRISMA-Driven Systematic Review.Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2024 Jul 28;17:11795476241266099. doi: 10.1177/11795476241266099. eCollection 2024. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39081345 Free PMC article.
-
A bibliometric analysis of immune-related adverse events in cancer patients and a meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.J Transl Int Med. 2024 Jul 27;12(3):225-243. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2024-0003. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Transl Int Med. 2024. PMID: 39081283 Free PMC article.
-
Association between glucose levels at admission and outcomes of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03126-2. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 39080623 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Outcomes and Challenges in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;24(3):79. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403079. eCollection 2023 Mar. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077495 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between intraoperative hypothermia and the ccurrence of surgical site infections: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Front Surg. 2024 Jul 11;11:1436366. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1436366. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 39072270 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S, editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] [ http://www.cochrane-handbook.org]
-
- Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2013. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
-
- Devereaux PJ, Choi PTL, El-Dika S, Bhandari M, Montori VM, Schünemann HJ, Garg AX, Busse JW, Heels-Ansdell D, Ghali WA, Manns BJ, Guyatt GH. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1232–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.017. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources