Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 1;19(1):e93-7.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.19176.

Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed ex vivo by dental students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain

Affiliations

Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed ex vivo by dental students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain

Sophie Román-Richon et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate radiographically the quality of root canal fillings and compare manual and rotary preparation performed on extracted teeth by undergraduate dental students.

Study design: A total of 561 premolars and molars extracted teeth were prepared using nickel-titanium rotary files or manual instrumentation and filled with gutta-percha using a cold lateral condensation technique, by 4th grade undergraduate students. Periapical radiographs were used to assess the technical quality of the root canal filling, evaluating three variables: length, density and taper. These data were recorded, scored and used to study the "technical success rate" and the "overall score". The length of each root canal filling was classified as acceptable, short and overfilled, based on their relationship with the radiographic apex. Density and taper of filling were evaluated based on the presence of voids and the uniform tapering of the filling, respectively. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the quality of root canal treatment, considering p < 0.05 as a statistical significant level.

Results: The percentage of technical success was 44% and the overall score was 7.8 out of 10. Technical success and overall score were greater with rotary instruments (52% against 28% with a manual one, p < 0.001; 8.3 against 6.7 respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: It appears that inexperienced operators perform better root canal treatment (RCT) with the use of rotary instrumentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation of the tooth # 205 (premolar; 1 canal; manual instrumentation). Length = 0; Density = 0; Taper = 0 ? Overall score = 0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of tooth # 248 (molar; 3 canals; rotary instrumentation). (1) (2) First and second canals: Length = 1; Density = 1; Taper = 1 (3) Third canal: Length = 0; Density = 1; Taper = 1 ? Overall score = 8.9.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39:921–30. - PubMed
    1. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature. Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41:6–31. - PubMed
    1. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy - a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J. 1993;26:321–33. - PubMed
    1. Peak JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The outcome of root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal Air Force) Br Dent J. 2001;190:140–4. - PubMed
    1. Eleftheriadis GI, Lambrianidis TP. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J. 2005;38:725–34. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources