Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;38(6):784-93.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.162. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults

J van Can et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Jun.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanisms for liraglutide-induced weight loss are poorly understood.

Objective: We investigated the effects of liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese non-diabetic individuals.

Design: Participants (N=49, 18-75 years, body mass index: 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomized to two of three treatments: liraglutide 1.8 mg, 3.0 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, incomplete crossover trial. After 5 weeks, 24-h energy expenditure (EE) and substrate oxidation were measured in a respiratory chamber. Gastric emptying (acetaminophen absorption method), glycemic parameters and appetite were assessed during a 5-h meal test. Ad libitum energy intake during a subsequent lunch was also assessed.

Results: Five-hour gastric emptying (AUC(0-300 min)) was found to be equivalent for liraglutide 1.8 versus 3.0 mg (primary end point), and for both liraglutide doses versus placebo, as 90% confidence intervals for the estimated treatment ratios were contained within the prespecified interval (0.80-1.25). However, 1-h gastric emptying was 23% lower than placebo with liraglutide 3.0 mg (P=0.007), and a nonsignificant 13% lower than placebo with liraglutide 1.8 mg (P=0.14). Both liraglutide doses similarly reduced fasting glucose (0.5-0.6 mmol l(-1) versus placebo, P<0.0001), glucose Cmax and 1-h AUC versus placebo; only liraglutide 3.0 mg reduced iAUC(0-300 min) (by ∼26% versus placebo, P=0.02). Glucagon iAUC(0-300 min) decreased by ∼30%, and iAUC(0-60 min) for insulin and C-peptide was ∼20% lower with both liraglutide doses versus placebo. Liraglutide doses similarly increased mean postprandial satiety and fullness ratings, reduced hunger and prospective food consumption and decreased ad libitum energy intake by ∼16%. Liraglutide-associated reductions in EE were partly explained by a decrease in body weight. A relative shift toward increased fat and reduced carbohydrate oxidation was observed with liraglutide. Clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT00978393.

Funding: Novo Nordisk.

Conclusion: Gastric emptying AUC(0-300 min) was equivalent for liraglutide 1.8 and 3.0 mg, and for liraglutide versus placebo, whereas reductions in 1-h gastric emptying of 23% with liraglutide 3.0 mg and 13% with 1.8 mg versus placebo were observed. Liraglutide 3.0 mg improved postprandial glycemia to a greater extent than liraglutide 1.8 mg. Liraglutide-induced weight loss appears to be mediated by reduced appetite and energy intake rather than increased EE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial design FBG, fasting blood glucose.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of liraglutide and placebo on gastric emptying. Data are presented as mean±s.e.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of liraglutide and placebo on postprandial glucose, glucagon, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations. Data are presented as mean±s.e.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Appetite ratings (assessed by visual analog scale, VAS) following the breakfast meal, and energy intake during ad libitum lunch meal, served 5 h after breakfast. Data for energy intake are estimated means, appetite ratings are presented as mean±s.e. and treatment differences are calculated using the parametric linear mixed-effect model on the original outcome values. The model included effects of subject, period and treatment group and the subject effect was included as a random effect. ETD, estimated treatment difference; OAS, overall appetite score. OAS=(satiety + fullness + (100−hunger) + (100−prospective food consumption))/4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Total 24-h energy expenditure. Data are estimated means. Treatment differences were calculated using the parametric linear mixed-effect model including effects of period and treatment group. Subject was included as a random effect. ETD, estimated treatment difference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404:635–643. - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA. 2003;289:76–79. - PubMed
    1. Bays HE. Current and investigational antiobesity agents and obesity therapeutic treatment targets. Obes Res. 2004;12:1197–1211. - PubMed
    1. Meier JJ, Gethmann A, Gotze O, Gallwitz B, Holst JJ, Schmidt WE, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 abolishes the postprandial rise in triglyceride concentrations and lowers levels of non-esterified fatty acids in humans. Diabetologia. 2006;49:452–458. - PubMed
    1. Wettergren A, Schjoldager B, Mortensen PE, Myhre J, Christiansen J, Holst JJ. Truncated GLP-1 (proglucagon 78-107-amide) inhibits gastric and pancreatic functions in man. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:665–673. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data