Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Feb;36(1):84-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Effects of environmental stimulation on infant vocalizations and orofacial dynamics at the onset of canonical babbling

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of environmental stimulation on infant vocalizations and orofacial dynamics at the onset of canonical babbling

Meredith Poore Harold et al. Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The vocalizations and jaw kinematics of 30 infants aged 6-8 months were recorded using a Motion Analysis System and audiovisual technologies. This study represents the first attempt to determine the effect of play environment on infants' rate of vocalization and jaw movement. Four play conditions were compared: watching videos, social contingent reinforcement and vocal modeling with an adult, playing alone with small toys, and playing alone with large toys. The fewest vocalizations and spontaneous movement were observed when infants were watching videos or interacting with an adult. Infants vocalized most when playing with large toys. The small toys, which naturally elicited gross motor movement (e.g., waving, banging, shaking), educed fewer vocalizations. This study was also the first to quantify the kinematics of vocalized and non-vocalized jaw movements of 6-8 month-old infants. Jaw kinematics did not differentiate infants who produced canonical syllables from those who did not. All infants produced many jaw movements without vocalization. However, during vocalization, infants were unlikely to move their jaw. This contradicts current theories that infant protophonic vocalizations are jaw-dominant. Results of the current study can inform socio-linguistic and kinematic theories of canonical babbling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Head block array and jaw marker (left); Jaw marker and laryngeal accelerometer (right)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Test Conditions: LargePlay, SmallPlay, Social
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protophonic jaw cycles by age, blocked into 6, 7, and 8-month-olds. Black circles = CB; White circles = NB

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Speech–Language-Hearing–Association. Roles and Responsibilities of Speech–Language Pathologists in Early Intervention: Guidelines. 2008 Available from www.asha.org/policy.
    1. Davis BL, MacNeilage PF. The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995;38:1199–1211. - PubMed
    1. Delack JB. Aspects of infant speech development in the first year of life. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 1978;21:17–37.
    1. DeLoache JS, Chiong C, Sherman K, Islam N, Vanderborght M, Troseth GL, Strouse GA, O'Doherty K. Do babies learn from baby media? Psychological Science. 2010;21(11):1570–1574. - PubMed
    1. Eilers RE, Oller DK, Levine S, Basinger D, Lynch MP, Urbano R. The role of prematurity and socioeconomic status in the onset of canonical babbling in infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 1993;16:297–315.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources