Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;97(5):1663-72.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3172. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Features of hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance unique to type 1 diabetes

Affiliations

Features of hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance unique to type 1 diabetes

Bryan C Bergman et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 May.

Abstract

Context: Type 1 diabetes is known to be a state of insulin resistance; however, the tissues involved in whole-body insulin resistance are less well known. It is unclear whether insulin resistance is due to glucose toxicity in the post-Diabetes Control and Complications Trial era of tighter glucose control.

Objective: We performed this study to determine muscle and liver insulin sensitivity individuals with type 1 diabetes after overnight insulin infusion to lower fasting glucose concentration.

Design, patients, and methods: Fifty subjects [25 controls without and 25 individuals with type 1 diabetes (diabetes duration 22.9 ± 1.7 yr, without known end organ damage] were frequency matched on age and body mass index by group and studied. After 3 d of dietary control and overnight insulin infusion to normalize glucose, we performed a three-stage hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp infusing insulin at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m(2) · min. Glucose metabolism was quantified using an infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose. Hepatic insulin sensitivity was measured using the insulin IC(50) for glucose rate of appearance (Ra), whereas muscle insulin sensitivity was measured using the glucose rate of disappearance during the highest insulin dose.

Results: Throughout the study, glucose Ra was significantly greater in individuals compared with those without type 1 diabetes. The concentration of insulin required for 50% suppression of glucose Ra was 2-fold higher in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Glucose rate of disappearance was significantly lower in individuals with type 1 diabetes during the 8- and 40-mU/m(2) · min stages.

Conclusion: Insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle was a significant feature in type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, the etiology of insulin resistance was not explained by body mass index, percentage fat, plasma lipids, visceral fat, and physical activity and was also not fully explained by hyperglycemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Glucose concentration (A), enrichment (B), and insulin concentration (C) during basal and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. Values are means ± sem.¥, Significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during basal period and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. Values are means ± sem. §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Glucose Ra (A) during basal and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. The concentration of insulin required for IC50 of hepatic glucose production in both groups (B). Values are means ± sem. §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Glucose Rd (A), MCR (B), and MCR normalized to insulin concentration (C) for control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes during a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses and nonoxidative glucose disposal during the 40-mU/m2 · min insulin dose (D). §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. 1979. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA 241:2035–2038 - PubMed
    1. Zgibor JC, Piatt GA, Ruppert K, Orchard TJ, Roberts MS. 2006. Deficiencies of cardiovascular risk prediction models for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 29:1860–1865 - PubMed
    1. Dabelea D, Kinney G, Snell-Bergeon JK, Hokanson JE, Eckel RH, Ehrlich J, Garg S, Hamman RF, Rewers M. 2003. Effect of type 1 diabetes on the gender difference in coronary artery calcification: a role for insulin resistance? The Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes (CACTI) Study. Diabetes 52:2833–2839 - PubMed
    1. Sheetz MJ, King GL. 2002. Molecular understanding of hyperglycemia's adverse effects for diabetic complications. JAMA 288:2579–2588 - PubMed
    1. Schauer IE, Snell-Bergeon JK, Bergman BC, Maahs DM, Kretowski A, Eckel RH, Rewers M. 2011. Insulin resistance, defective insulin-mediated fatty acid suppression, and coronary artery calcification in subjects with and without type 1 diabetes: the CACTI study. Diabetes 60:306–314 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types