Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;38(5):607-18.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211435796. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

Guilty feelings, targeted actions

Affiliations

Guilty feelings, targeted actions

Cynthia E Cryder et al. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May.

Abstract

Early investigations of guilt cast it as an emotion that prompts broad reparative behaviors that help guilty individuals feel better about themselves or about their transgressions. The current investigation found support for a more recent representation of guilt as an emotion designed to identify and correct specific social offenses. Across five experiments, guilt influenced behavior in a targeted and strategic way. Guilt prompted participants to share resources more generously with others, but only did so when those others were persons whom the participant had wronged and only when those wronged individuals could notice the gesture. Rather than trigger broad reparative behaviors that remediate one's general reputation or self-perception, guilt triggers targeted behaviors intended to remediate specific social transgressions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mediation by self-reported guilt. Note: Coefficients without parentheses are parameter estimates from a simple linear regression model; coefficients in parentheses are parameter estimates from a regression model containing both predictors. Asterisks indicate parameter estimates significantly different from zero,* < .05 and ** < .01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Guilt increases spending only when guilt is relevant to the recipient. Note: Guilty people spend more on others than do controls when choosing wine to share (Panel A) and contributing extra money to a dinner bill (Panel B), but only when the recipients are “integral,” or related, to source of their emotion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Guilt, but not immorality, prompts different spending based on recipient. Note: People experiencing feelings of immorality spend similarly regardless of recipient type. People experiencing feelings of guilt spend selectively, increasing spending only when the recipient was a victim of their transgression (in this case, in their project group).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Guilt increases spending only when recipients can notice the gesture. Note: Guilty people spend more on wine to share with others than do controls, but only when the recipients are wine experts and are able to notice the gesture.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amodio DM, Devine PG, Harmon-Jones E. A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science. 2007;18:524–530. - PubMed
    1. Ausubel DP. Relationships between shame and guilt in the socialization process. Psychological Review. 1955;67:378–390. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Stillwell AM, Heatherton TF. Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1994;115:243–267. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Stillwell AM, Heatherton TF. Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1995;17:173–198.
    1. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–571. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources