Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 30;17(11):1481-9.
doi: 10.1038/nm.2513.

Interleukin-6 enhances insulin secretion by increasing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from L cells and alpha cells

Affiliations

Interleukin-6 enhances insulin secretion by increasing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from L cells and alpha cells

Helga Ellingsgaard et al. Nat Med. .

Abstract

Exercise, obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with elevated plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone that induces insulin secretion. Here we show that administration of IL-6 or elevated IL-6 concentrations in response to exercise stimulate GLP-1 secretion from intestinal L cells and pancreatic alpha cells, improving insulin secretion and glycemia. IL-6 increased GLP-1 production from alpha cells through increased proglucagon (which is encoded by GCG) and prohormone convertase 1/3 expression. In models of type 2 diabetes, the beneficial effects of IL-6 were maintained, and IL-6 neutralization resulted in further elevation of glycemia and reduced pancreatic GLP-1. Hence, IL-6 mediates crosstalk between insulin-sensitive tissues, intestinal L cells and pancreatic islets to adapt to changes in insulin demand. This previously unidentified endocrine loop implicates IL-6 in the regulation of insulin secretion and suggests that drugs modulating this loop may be useful in type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of acute IL-6 on GLP-1 and insulin secretion in vivo. (a) Plasma IL-6 (left; resting, n = 3 and running, n = 12) and GLP-1 (right; resting, n = 3 and running, n = 4) in resting and running male mice. Arrow at 90 min indicates exhaustion and blood sampling. (b) Plasma GLP-1 in male mice before and after 90 min of running (n = 6). KO, knockout; IL-6AB, antibodies to IL-6. (c) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT) (left) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (right) in female mice after a single injection of NaCl (ctrl) or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 4). IL-6inj, mice injected with IL-6 .(d) OGTT after a single injection of NaCl or IL-6 in female mice (n = 12). (e) Plasma insulin (left) and GLP-1 (right) concentrations in female mice in response to oral glucose after a single injection of NaCl or IL-6 (n = 4); −30 min indicates the baseline measurement before NaCl or IL-6 injection, and 0 min indicates time point of glucose administration. (f) OGTT in male wild-type (WT) littermates (left) and GLP-1–receptor knockout (Glp1r−/−) (right) mice after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 6–10). (g) Oral-glucose–stimulated insulin secretion in male WT littermate (left) and Glp1r−/− (right) mice after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 6–10). (h) OGTT in male mice after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 in the absence and presence of exendin (ex) (9–39) (n = 4). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control to IL-6 injection, resting to running or IL-6 to IL-6 plus exendin (9–39). *P < 0.05, $P < 0.05, #P < 0.05, determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing control to IL-6 injections (d,e).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of 1-week IL-6 injections on glucose homeostasis and GLP-1 production. (a) Fasting and fed blood glucose concentrations in male control mice and IL-6inj mice (n = 8). (b) Fasting plasma hormones in male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 6–8). (c) Plasma GLP-1 concentrations in response to oral glucose in male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 8). (d) Intraperitoneal GTT (ipGTT) (left) and plasma insulin in response to intraperitoneal glucose (right) in male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 8). (e) IpGTT (left) and plasma insulin in response to intraperitoneal glucose (right) in male control mice in the absence or presence of exendin (ex) (9–39) (n = 4). (f) IpGTT (left) and plasma insulin in response to intraperitoneal glucose (right) in male IL-6inj mice in the absence or presence of exendin (9–39) (n = 4). (g) Intestinal proglucagon (Gcg) mRNA expression (left) and intestinal GLP-1 content (right) in male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 8). (h) Pancreatic GLP-1 (left), glucagon (middle) and insulin (right) abundance in male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 8). (i) GLP-1 release over 24 h in isolated mouse islets from male control and IL-6inj mice (n = 5 PER GROUP). (j) Intestinal mRNA expression in male control and IL-6inj mice. Data are expressed as a fold of the jejenum control (n = 8). ND, not detectable. Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control to IL-6inj mice.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of IL-6 on GLP-1 secretion in GLUTag cells. (a) Western blots of IL-6 receptor (top, with HeLa cell extract as the positive control (ctrl)), pSTAT3 (middle) and actin (bottom). (b) GLP-1 secretion after 15 min of stimulation with IL-6 and 0.1 mM glucose; we used 1 μM glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) as the positive control (n = 5). (c) Capacitance traces following stimulation with IL-6 (top left). Average capacitance following 15 min of stimulation with or without IL-6 (top right, n = 6–11). Ca2+ current following stimulation with or without IL-6 (bottom left, n = 6–11). Average capacitance following 15 min of stimulation with or without IL-6 and AG490 (bottom right, n = 5–9). (d) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (left, n = 3). GLP-1 content after 24 h with or without IL-6 (middle, n = 6). GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 0–24 h with or without IL-6 (right, n = 3). (e) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (left, n = 3). GLP-1 content after 24 h with or without IL-6 (right, n = 3). (f) GLUTag mRNA in response to IL-6; data are expressed as a fold of the untreated control (broken line) (n = 3–6). (g) GLUTag mRNA after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 3). (h) 2-deoxy-3H-D-glucose (3H-2dG) uptake after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 4). (i) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 3). (j) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 0.1 or 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 6). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by ANOVA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of IL-6 on GLP-1 secretion in GLUTag cells. (a) Western blots of IL-6 receptor (top, with HeLa cell extract as the positive control (ctrl)), pSTAT3 (middle) and actin (bottom). (b) GLP-1 secretion after 15 min of stimulation with IL-6 and 0.1 mM glucose; we used 1 μM glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) as the positive control (n = 5). (c) Capacitance traces following stimulation with IL-6 (top left). Average capacitance following 15 min of stimulation with or without IL-6 (top right, n = 6–11). Ca2+ current following stimulation with or without IL-6 (bottom left, n = 6–11). Average capacitance following 15 min of stimulation with or without IL-6 and AG490 (bottom right, n = 5–9). (d) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (left, n = 3). GLP-1 content after 24 h with or without IL-6 (middle, n = 6). GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 0–24 h with or without IL-6 (right, n = 3). (e) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (left, n = 3). GLP-1 content after 24 h with or without IL-6 (right, n = 3). (f) GLUTag mRNA in response to IL-6; data are expressed as a fold of the untreated control (broken line) (n = 3–6). (g) GLUTag mRNA after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 3). (h) 2-deoxy-3H-D-glucose (3H-2dG) uptake after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 4). (i) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 3). (j) GLP-1 secretion in response to 2 h of stimulation with 0.1 or 11 mM glucose after 24 h with or without IL-6 (n = 6). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by ANOVA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of IL-6 on GLP-1 secretion in human islets and human alpha cells. (a) GLP-1 release (left) over 24 h after 4 d with or without IL-6 and with (+) or without (−) the IL-6 receptor antagonist Sant7 (n = 3). GLP-1 secretion (right) in response to 1 h of static incubation in 10 mM arginine after 5 days with or without IL-6 and with (+) or without (−) Sant7 (n = 3). (b) Human islet insulin secretion in response to 1 h of static incubation in unconditioned or conditioned medium from human islets in the absence and presence of exendin (9–39) (n = 3). (c) Basal GLP-1 and IL-6 released from various human islet preparations (n = 6, r2 = 0.46, P = 0.058). (d) GLP-1 (left) and glucagon (right) released over consecutive 24 h intervals with or without IL-6 (n = 4). (e) GLP-1 (left) and glucagon (right) secretion in response to 1-h glucose incubations after 4 d with or without IL-6 (n = 4). (f) GLP-1 content (left), glucagon content (middle) and GLP-1:glucagon content as a molar ratio (right) after 4 days with or without IL-6 (n = 3–4). (g) FACS-enriched human alpha cell mRNA in response to IL-6 (n = 3–6). (h) FACS-sorted human beta cell mRNA in response to IL-6 (n = 4). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control to IL-6 or unconditioned to conditioned medium, or determined by ANOVA (g,h) comparing control (at time 0) to IL-6.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of acute IL-6 on insulin secretion in animal models of prediabetes and diabetes. (a) Plasma insulin (left) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (right) in response to oral glucose in male chow-fed mice after a single injection of NaCl (ctrl) or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 8). (b) Plasma insulin (left) and OGTT (right) in response to oral glucose in male mice fed a high-fat diet (HF) for 18 weeks after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 8). (c) Plasma insulin (left) and OGTT (right) in response to oral glucose in male ob/ob mice after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 8). (d) Plasma insulin (left) and OGTT (right) in response to oral glucose in male db/db mice after a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 5). (e) Plasma insulin (left) and OGTT (right) in response to oral glucose in mice fed a high-fat diet and treated with STZafter a single injection of NaCl or 400 ng of IL-6 (n = 5). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control to IL-6 injection.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of IL-6 antagonism in mice fed a high-fat diet and in db/db mice. (a) Pancreatic glucagon (left), GLP-1 (middle) and GLP-1:glucagon content as a molar ratio (right) in male WT and IL-6 knockout (KO) mice after 18 weeks of chow or high-fat diet (HF) (n = 8). (b) Immunohistochemistry of pancreatic tissue sections using antibodies against PC1, PC3 and glucagon (representative image of n = 5) (c) Pancreatic glucagon (left) and GLP-1 (right) in male mice fed chow or a high-fat diet for 15 weeks (n = 7–8). Mice on a high-fat diet and injected with IL-6 (HF IL-6inj) received IL-6 twice daily for the last 7 days of the study, and mice fed on a high-fat diet and injected with an antibody to IL-6 (HF IL-6AB) received an antibody that neutralized IL-6 for the last 4 weeks of the study. (d) Pcsk1 mRNA in FACS-sorted alpha cells from male mice expressing a yellow fluorescent protein under the control of the glucagon promoter after 20 weeks on chow or a high-fat diet (n = 5–8). Blood glucose (e), ipGTT (left), ITT (middle) and plasma insulin (right) (f) in response to intraperitoneal glucose in male db/db mice after 4 weeks without (db/db ctrl) or with (db/db IL-6AB) treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). (g) Fasting plasma hormones in male db/db mice with or without treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). (h) Pancreatic hormone content in male db/db mice with or without treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *,#P < 0.05, determined by ANOVA, where the asterisk compares chow to a high-fat diet, and # compares genotypes on a high-fat diet only (a) or high-fat diet to a high-fat diet plus antibodies to IL-6 (c). In eh, *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control mice to mice injected with antibodies to IL-6.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of IL-6 antagonism in mice fed a high-fat diet and in db/db mice. (a) Pancreatic glucagon (left), GLP-1 (middle) and GLP-1:glucagon content as a molar ratio (right) in male WT and IL-6 knockout (KO) mice after 18 weeks of chow or high-fat diet (HF) (n = 8). (b) Immunohistochemistry of pancreatic tissue sections using antibodies against PC1, PC3 and glucagon (representative image of n = 5) (c) Pancreatic glucagon (left) and GLP-1 (right) in male mice fed chow or a high-fat diet for 15 weeks (n = 7–8). Mice on a high-fat diet and injected with IL-6 (HF IL-6inj) received IL-6 twice daily for the last 7 days of the study, and mice fed on a high-fat diet and injected with an antibody to IL-6 (HF IL-6AB) received an antibody that neutralized IL-6 for the last 4 weeks of the study. (d) Pcsk1 mRNA in FACS-sorted alpha cells from male mice expressing a yellow fluorescent protein under the control of the glucagon promoter after 20 weeks on chow or a high-fat diet (n = 5–8). Blood glucose (e), ipGTT (left), ITT (middle) and plasma insulin (right) (f) in response to intraperitoneal glucose in male db/db mice after 4 weeks without (db/db ctrl) or with (db/db IL-6AB) treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). (g) Fasting plasma hormones in male db/db mice with or without treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). (h) Pancreatic hormone content in male db/db mice with or without treatment with antibodies to IL-6 (n = 4–5). Data represent means ± s.e.m. *,#P < 0.05, determined by ANOVA, where the asterisk compares chow to a high-fat diet, and # compares genotypes on a high-fat diet only (a) or high-fat diet to a high-fat diet plus antibodies to IL-6 (c). In eh, *P < 0.05, determined by Student’s t test comparing control mice to mice injected with antibodies to IL-6.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spranger J, et al. Inflammatory cytokines and the risk to develop type 2 diabetes: results of the prospective population-based European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Diabetes. 2003;52:812–817. - PubMed
    1. Herder C, et al. Association of systemic chemokine concentrations with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes: results from the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg Survey S4 (KORA S4) Diabetes. 2005;54(Suppl 2):S11–S17. - PubMed
    1. Mohamed-Ali V, et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue releases interleukin-6, but not tumor necrosis factor-α, in vivo. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997;82:4196–4200. - PubMed
    1. Lazar MA. How obesity causes diabetes: not a tall tale. Science. 2005;307:373–375. - PubMed
    1. Ostrowski K, Rohde T, Zacho M, Asp S, Pedersen BK. Evidence that interleukin-6 is produced in human skeletal muscle during prolonged running. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1998;508:949–953. - PMC - PubMed

ONLINE METHODS REFERENCES

    1. Schuler B, et al. Optimal hematocrit for maximal exercise performance in acute and chronic erythropoietin-treated mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:419–423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jevdjovic T, et al. Effects of insulin-like growth factor-I treatment on the endocrine pancreas of hypophysectomized rats: comparison with growth hormone replacement. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2004;151:223–231. - PubMed
    1. Jevdjovic T, et al. The effect of hypophysectomy on pancreatic islet hormone and insulin-like growth factor I content and mRNA expression in rat. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2005;123:179–188. - PubMed
    1. Sporeno E, et al. Human interleukin-6 receptor super-antagonists with high potency and wide spectrum on multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 1996;87:4510–4519. - PubMed
    1. Parnaud G, et al. Proliferation of sorted human and rat beta cells. Diabetologia. 2008;51:91–100. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms