Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;119(3):291-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03167.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

Maternal waist to hip ratio is a risk factor for macrosomia

Affiliations

Maternal waist to hip ratio is a risk factor for macrosomia

W Salem et al. BJOG. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Fetal growth during pregnancy may be affected by the metabolic activity and distribution of fat stores in women. This study investigates the association between waist to hip ratio (WHR) as a measure of the distribution of adiposity in primiparous mothers living in Avon, England, and macrosomia in their offspring.

Design: Prospective historical cohort study.

Setting: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) prospective cohort study in Avon, UK.

Population: A cohort of 3083 primiparous women with a term singleton delivery with expected dates of delivery from 1 April 1991 to 31 December 1992.

Methods: The distribution of WHR was categorised into quartiles. We compared the second, third and fourth quartiles against the first (reference) quartile with respect to whether the mother delivered a macrosomic newborn. We controlled for maternal age, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), marital status and racial group using multivariate logistic regression.

Main outcome measures: Macrosomia defined in three ways: birthweight ≥ 4000 g; birthweight ≥ 4500 g; large for gestational age (LGA: ≥ 95th percentile of birth weight adjusted for sex and gestational age).

Results: Waist to hip ratios in the third and fourth quartiles were associated with a higher odds of delivering a macrosomic infant, defined as a birthweight ≥ 4000 g (third quartile, OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.26; fourth quartile, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42) or as LGA (≥95th percentile of the cohort; third quartile, OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.10-2.85; fourth quartile, OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.91). When defined as a birthweight ≥ 4500 g, the fourth quartile was associated with increased odds of macrosomia (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.05-7.16). Odds ratios after adjustment for confounding factors followed a similar pattern.

Conclusion: Independent of confounding factors, women with increased WHRs were significantly more likely to give birth to macrosomic newborns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources