Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;104(4):155-61.
doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.100271.

Exposing the evidence gap for complementary and alternative medicine to be integrated into science-based medicine

Michael Power  1 , Kevork Hopayian
Affiliations
Review

Exposing the evidence gap for complementary and alternative medicine to be integrated into science-based medicine

Michael Power et al. J R Soc Med. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

When people who advocate integrating conventional science-based medicine with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are confronted with the lack of evidence to support CAM they counter by calling for more research, diverting attention to the 'package of care' and its non-specific effects, and recommending unblinded 'pragmatic trials'. We explain why these responses cannot close the evidence gap, and focus on the risk of biased results from open (unblinded) pragmatic trials. These are clinical trials which compare a treatment with 'usual care' or no additional care. Their risk of bias has been overlooked because the components of outcome measurements have not been taken into account. The components of an outcome measure are the specific effect of the intervention and non-specific effects such as true placebo effects, cognitive measurement biases, and other effects (which tend to cancel out when similar groups are compared). Negative true placebo effects ('frustrebo effects') in the comparison group, and cognitive measurement biases in the comparison group and the experimental group make the non-specific effect look like a benefit for the intervention group. However, the clinical importance of these effects is often dismissed or ignored without justification. The bottom line is that, for results from open pragmatic trials to be trusted, research is required to measure the clinical importance of true placebo effects, cognitive bias effects, and specific effects of treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86–9 - PubMed
    1. Laurance J A nudge in the wrong direction. BMJ 2010;341:c7248. - PubMed
    1. MacPherson H, Peters D, Zollman C Closing the evidence gap in integrative medicine. BMJ 2009;339:b3335. - PubMed
    1. Moerman DE Meaning, Medicine and the 'Placebo Effect'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002
    1. Ernst E A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002;54:577–82 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms