Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul-Sep;4(3):216-25.
doi: 10.4161/fly.4.3.12280. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

An assay for social interaction in Drosophila fragile X mutants

Affiliations

An assay for social interaction in Drosophila fragile X mutants

Francois V Bolduc et al. Fly (Austin). 2010 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

We developed a novel assay to examine social interactions in Drosophila and, as a first attempt, apply it here at examining the behavior of Drosophila Fragile X Mental Retardation gene (dfmr1) mutants. Fragile X syndrome is the most common cause of single gene intellectual disability (ID) and is frequently associated with autism. Our results suggest that dfmr1 mutants are less active than wild-type flies and interact with each other less often. In addition, mutants for one allele of dfmr1, dfmr1(B55), are more likely to come in close contact with a wild-type fly than another dfmr1(B55) mutant. Our results raise the possibility of defective social expression with preserved receptive abilities. We further suggest that the assay may be applied in a general strategy of examining endophenoypes of complex human neurological disorders in Drosophila, and specifically in order to understand the genetic basis of social interaction defects linked with ID.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1A and B. Pair-wise Fragile X mutant dfmr1B55 social behavior differs from wild-type. (A and B) Joint spatial distributions p(x,y) for wild-type (A) and dfmr1B55 flies (B). A single fly is placed in each chamber for each test, and the experiment is performed for N pairs of flies (N = 7 pairs for WT and N = 9 pairs for dfmr1B55). The small chamber is designated as Chamber 1 (C1) and the long chamber is designated as Chamber 2 (C2). The divider between boundaries is at y = 0 cm.
None
Figure 1C–H. Pair-wise Fragile X mutant dfmr1B55 behavior differs from wild-type. (C and D) Marginal probability distribution p(y) of wild-type (C) and dfmr1B55 (d) flies in Cl. (E and F) Marginal distribution of wild-type (E) and dfmr1B5 (F) flies in C2. (G and H) Interfly distance distribution p(d) for wild-type (G) and dfmr1B55 (H) flies.
None
Figure 2. Pair-wise Fragile X dfmr1 mutant social behavior. (A and B) Joint spatial distributions p(x,y) with a dfmr1 mutant in each chamber or with wild-type fly in C1 and a dfmr1 fly in C2 (B). (C and D) Marginal probability distribution p(y) of dfmr1 mutant (C) and wild-type (D) in C1. (E and F) Marginal distribution of dfmr1 mutant in C2 when exposed to wild-type (E) or mutant dfmr1 (f) in C1. (G and H) Interfly distance distribution p(d) when dfmr1 are exposed to dfmr1 (G) or wild-type flies (H). N = 10 pairs for dfmr1-dfmr1 and N = 10 pairs for dfmr1-wild-type.
None
Figure 3. Modification of dfmr1B55 mutant social behavior. (A and B) Joint spatial distributions p(x,y) with a dfmr1B5 mutant in each chamber or with wild-type fly in C1 and a dfmr1B5 fly in C2 (B). (C and D) Marginal probability distribution p(y) of dfmr1B5 mutant (C) and wild-type (D) in C1. (E and F) Marginal distribution of dfmr1B5 mutant in C2 when exposed to wild-type (E) or mutant dfmr1B5 (F) in C1. (G and H) Interfly distance distribution p(d) when dfmr1B5 are exposed to dfmr1B5 (G) or wild-type flies (H). N = 9 pairs for dfmr1B5-dfmr1B5 and N = 10 pairs for dfmr1B5-wild-type.
None
Figure 4. Fragile X mutant behavior modification is influenced by behavior of both flies involved. (A) Tukey box-plots of the average fractional time spent by flies in chamber 1 at the top of the chamber for each genotype pair. In this plot, and all subsequent boxplots, the + symbols are outlier points, defined as having values greater than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the ends of the box. The dfmr1B5-dfmr1B5 and dfmr1B5-C2: dfmr1B5 groups are identical genotype pairs, but were tested on separate days and are presented as separate groups in the plots. dfmr1B5/dfmr1B5 correspond to the data in Figure 1, whereas dfmr1B5/C2: dfmr1B5 correspond to the data in Figure 3. (B) Average fractional time spent by fly in chamber 1 at the bottom of the chamber for each genotype pair. (C) Average fractional time spent by fly in chamber 2 at top of the chamber for each genotype pair. (D) Average fractional time spent by fly in chamber 2 at the bottom of the chamber for each genotype pair. (E) Average fractional time spent at an interfly distance less than 5 mm for each genotype pair. (F) Number of crossings of an imaginary line at various distances from the wall dividing chamber 1 and chamber 2 for each genotype. Statistical comparison summary for (A–E) is shown in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fuller JL, Hahn ME. Issues in the genetics of social behavior. Behav Genet. 1976;6:391–406. doi: 10.1007/BF01065697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sturtevant A. Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila. Anim Behav. 1915;5:351–66. doi: 10.1037/h0074109. - DOI
    1. Hoffmann AA, Cohan FM. Olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster selected for knockdown resistance to ethanol. Behav Genet. 1987;17:307–12. doi: 10.1007/BF01065509. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baier A, Wittek B, Brembs B. Drosophila as a new model organism for the neurobiology of aggression? J Exp Biol. 2002;205:1233–40. - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA. Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:5664–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082102599. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources