Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;95(2):699-706.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1907. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

Fat mass exerts a greater effect on cortical bone mass in girls than boys

Affiliations

Fat mass exerts a greater effect on cortical bone mass in girls than boys

Adrian Sayers et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Context: It is unclear whether fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) differ in the way they influence cortical bone development in boys and girls.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the contributions of total body FM and LM to parameters related to cortical bone mass and geometry.

Design/setting: We conducted a longitudinal birth cohort study, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Participants: A total of 4005 boys and girls (mean age, 15.5 yr) participated in the study.

Outcome measures: We measured cortical bone mass, cortical bone mineral content (BMC(C)), cortical bone mineral density, periosteal circumference (PC), and endosteal circumference by tibial peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Results: LM had a similar positive association with BMC(C) in boys and girls [regression coefficients with 95% confidence interval (CI); P for gender interactions: boys/girls, 0.952 (0.908, 0.997); P = 0.85]. However, the mechanisms by which LM influenced bone mass differed according to gender because LM was positively associated with PC more strongly in girls [boys, 0.579 (0.522, 0.635); girls, 0.799 (0.722, 0.875); P < 0.0001], but was only associated with cortical bone mineral density in boys [boys, 0.443 (0.382, 0.505); girls, 0.014 (-0.070, 0.097); P < 0.0001]. There was a stronger positive association between FM and BMC(C) in girls [boys, 0.227 (0.185, 0.269); girls, 0.355 (0.319, 0.392); P < 0.0001]. This reflected both a greater positive association of FM with PC in girls [boys, 0.213 (0.174, 0.253); girls, 0.312 (0.278, 0.347); P = 0.0002], and a stronger negative association with endosteal circumference(PC) [boys, -0.059 (-0.096, 0.021); girls, -0.181 (-0.215, -0.146); P < 0.0001].

Conclusions: Whereas LM stimulates the accrual of cortical bone mass to a similar extent in boys and girls, FM is a stronger stimulus for accrual of cortical bone mass in girls, reflecting a greater tendency in females for FM to stimulate periosteal growth and suppress endosteal expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Pathway coefficients for the effects of LM (A) and FM (B) on BMCC via PC, EC adjusted for PC, and BMDC in boys and girls. The sum of these pathways, representing the overall influence of LM or FM on BMCC is shown at the bottom. Line thickness depicts overall effect size.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seeman E. Periosteal bone formation—a neglected determinant of bone strength. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:320–323. - PubMed
    1. Cooper C. Osteoporosis—an epidemiological perspective: a review. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:753–757. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forwood MR, Bailey DA, Beck TJ, Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Uusi-Rasi K. Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis. Bone. 2004;35:973–981. - PubMed
    1. Högler W, Blimkie CJ, Cowell CT, Kemp AF, Briody J, Wiebe P, Farpour-Lambert N, Duncan CS, Woodhead HJ. A comparison of bone geometry and cortical density at the mid-femur between prepuberty and young adulthood using magnetic resonance imaging. Bone. 2003;33:771–778. - PubMed
    1. Kontulainen SA, Macdonald HM, Khan KM, McKay HA. Examining bone surfaces across puberty: a 20-month pQCT trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1202–1207. - PubMed

Publication types