Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch
- PMID: 19896001
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003
Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch
Abstract
The hedonic attributes of tactile stimulation are important to one's quality of life, yet they have rarely been studied scientifically. The earliest experimental investigations suggested soft and smooth materials as pleasant, those that were stiff, rough, or coarse as unpleasant. More recent studies conducted by the authors and described herein obtained ratings of pleasantness of different textured materials stroked across the skin of multiple body sites at controlled velocities and forces of application. Statistically significant interactions between materials, sites, velocities, forces and subject sex attest to the complexity of the percept. Less pleasant percepts arose from stimuli that were rougher. However, the difficulty in making further general statements regarding hedonic touch raises questions as to whether the body surface can be mapped affectively in a meaningful manner with a single stimulus and indeed whether pleasantness-to-touch can be viewed as a unidimensional construct.
Similar articles
-
Reduced C-afferent fibre density affects perceived pleasantness and empathy for touch.Brain. 2011 Apr;134(Pt 4):1116-26. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr011. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Brain. 2011. PMID: 21378097
-
Pleasantness of touch in human glabrous and hairy skin: order effects on affective ratings.Brain Res. 2011 Oct 12;1417:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Aug 11. Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21907328
-
Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jan;237(1):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 30374784 Free PMC article.
-
Touch and the body.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):224-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Apr 17. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010. PMID: 19376156 Review.
-
Affective touch: A meta-analysis on sex differences.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.037. Epub 2019 Oct 12. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 31614152 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials in younger and older adults.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):e0296633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296633. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38252623 Free PMC article.
-
Autistic Traits Related to the Importance of Interpersonal Touch and Appreciation of Observed Touch during COVID-19 Social Distancing.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 11;20(18):6738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186738. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37754599 Free PMC article.
-
Salivary Oxytocin and Antioxidative Response to Robotic Touch in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 1;24(15):12322. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512322. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37569698 Free PMC article.
-
Hedonic and autonomic responses in promoting affective touch.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37471-9. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37433850 Free PMC article.
-
I wanna hold your hand: Handholding is preferred over gentle stroking for emotion regulation.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0284161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284161. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37023083 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources